Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion

[Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

Seems reasonable to me and if I might say, seems suggested by IOC in the spirit 
of a very constructive compromise. 



Best regards, 

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com

Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.

Sent from my iPad

On 13 Mar 2012, at 17:25, Jim Bikoff <jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All,
> 
>  
> 
> A few small revisions, answering earlier questions:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Recommendation 2:    Protect the IOC/RCRC Terms in Multiple Languages
> 
>  
> 
>             The GAC has proposed that the IOC and RCRC “names should be 
> protected in multiple languages—all translations of the listed names in 
> languages used on the Internet…The lists of protected names that the IOC and 
> RC/RC have provided are illustrative and representative, not exhaustive.”   
> 
> The Drafting Team recommends that at the top level for this initial round, 
> the list of names in languages currently provided in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the 
> Applicant Guidebook is sufficient.
> 
> 
> Jim Bikoff
> 
>  
> 
> James L. Bikoff
> 
> Silverberg, Goldman & Bikoff, LLP
> 
> 1101 30th Street, NW
> 
> Suite 120
> 
> Washington, DC 20007
> 
> Tel: 202-944-3303
> 
> Fax: 202-944-3306
> 
> jbikoff@xxxxxxxxx
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: "Shatan, Gregory S." <GShatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: March 13, 2012 4:01:01 PM CST
> To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion
> 
> A few small proposed changes, and a point of clarification:
> 
>  
> 
> In the last new "Whereas" clause, I think the word "of" after "policy impact" 
> should be "on".
> 
>  
> 
> With the change to Recommendation 2, I would suggest that the title of 
> Recommendation 2 be changed to "In the Initial Round, Protect the IOC/RCRC 
> Terms in the Languages Provided in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant 
> Guidebook"  (It now still reads "Protect the IOC/RCRC Terms in as many 
> Languages as Feasible")
> 
>  
> 
> In recommendation 3 I would insert the word "names" after "RCRC" in the 
> newly-added language.
> 
>  
> 
> The point of clarification:
> 
>  
> 
> Recommendation 2 now refers to "the list of languages ... in Section 
> 2.2.1.2.3" of the AGB.  This Section does not in fact list "languages."  What 
> it does list are specific names/strings in a number of languages.  However, 
> it does not list all of the same strings in all of the languages.  For 
> instance, REDLIONANDSUN is listed in English only (at least among languages 
> using the Roman alphabet; perhaps it is there in Farsi as well).  
> MOGENDAVIDADOM is there in English, Hebrew and transliterated Hebrew only.  
> Some languages are used only for the IOC names and some only for the RCRC 
> names.
> 
>  
> 
> My question is:  Are we recommending that the specific names/strings listed 
> in the AGB be used at the top level in the first round?  Or are we 
> recommending that all the languages used in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the AGB be 
> applied to all  of the strings listed in Section 2.2.1.2.3 of the AGB (thus 
> expanding the total number of names/strings beyond those specifically on the 
> list, e.g., REDLIONANDSUN would now be "protected" in Chinese)? 
> 
>  
> 
> Greg
> 
>  
> 
> Gregory S. Shatan 
> Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group 
> IP | Technology | Media 
> ReedSmithLLP 
> The business of relationships
> 599 Lexington Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
> 212.549.0275 | Phone
> 917.816.6428 | Mobile
> 212.521.5450 | Fax
> gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.reedsmith.com
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 5:22 PM
> To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Revised Redline of Motion
> 
> All,
> 
> Based on the e-mails of the Drafting Team, please find enclosed the revised 
> version of the motion.  Once we are all ok, we will need someone at the 
> council to make these friendly amendments (after someone seconds the motion). 
>  Have you had discussions with your groups.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 21575 Ridgetop Circle, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz
> 
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
> of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have 
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete 
> the original message.
> 
>