Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] [REGYCON] FW: IOC/Red Cross DT: Proposed Narrowing of Options

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

My simple understanding of this is that everything that the Board did with 
regard to protecting Red Cross and the Olympic Committee is wrong headed and 
ignores relevant  international law.

It also points even further to a notion that we should get going on a PDP as 
soon as possible nd should avoid telegraphing what may or may not be resolbved 
in the PDP.

avri

On 6 Sep 2012, at 14:37, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Ricardo Guilherme from the UPU, our newest member of the RySG, gave Jeff & I 
> permission to forward this to the discussion group list.  I think you will 
> find it relevant to our work.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> GUILHERME ricardo
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 12:15 PM
> To: 'regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Cc: DONOHOE paul
> Subject: RE: [REGYCON] FW: IOC/Red Cross DT: Proposed Narrowing of Options
>  
> Dear Chuck and All,
>  
> As promised, please find attached the UPU’s submission (concerning matters of 
> principle that cannot be ignored by us as an intergovernmental organization), 
> which in our view is absolutely necessary to clarify a great number of flawed 
> considerations/conclusions contained in the Unredacted Paper, and to duly 
> inform any advice to be provided by the RySG (and potentially other involved 
> groups) on this extremely important matter.
>  
> We would particularly invite Chuck and Jeff to take a careful look at it, 
> considering their active participation in the IOC/RC discussion group (please 
> feel free to convey the considerations contained in the attached document to 
> that group as well). Finally, we stress that this submission, which is sent 
> solely in the name of the UPU, will probably be shared also with other 
> relevant ICANN groups involved with these issues.
>  
> In any case, please let us know if you have any questions – and thank you 
> again for the productive discussions today.
>  
> With best regards,
>  
> Ricardo Guilherme Filho, LL.M., MILE
> Expert (Lawyer)
> Legal Affairs Directorate
>  
> International Bureau
> Weltpoststrasse 4
> Case postale
> 3000 BERNE 15
> SWITZERLAND
>  
> T +41 31 350 35 25
> F +41 31 350 31 10
>  
> www.upu.int
>  
> <image001.jpg>
>  
> <image002.jpg>
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> De : regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de 
> Gomes, Chuck
> Envoyé : mercredi 5 septembre 2012 16:39
> À : regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Objet : RE: [REGYCON] FW: IOC/Red Cross DT: Proposed Narrowing of Options
>  
> Thanks Bret.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Bret Fausett
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 10:29 AM
> To: regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [REGYCON] FW: IOC/Red Cross DT: Proposed Narrowing of Options
> Importance: High
>  
> Chuck, I think the message you intended to forward was the one below…
>  
>         Bret
>  
>  
> From: Bret Fausett <bret@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <regycon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [REGYCON] FW: IOC/Red Cross DT: Proposed Narrowing of Options
>  
> > Hope that helps.
>  
> Yes, it does. Thank you. As we've seen so often in ICANN policy development, 
> the starting point matters a great deal in determining where the end point is 
> drawn. I would rather have us start with no protection and require a PDP to 
> add protection than start with protection subject to change by a PDP. When a 
> group already has what it wants, it changes the nature of their participation 
> in the policy conversation.
>  
>         Bret
>   
> -- 
>  
>  
> -- 
>  
>  
> -- 
>  
>  
> <UPU Comments to the Unredacted Paper 05 Sep 12.pdf>