Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I thought this was out for SG/C review.

When did it morph into an approved resolution?

avri

On 17 Sep 2012, at 17:09, Shatan, Gregory S. wrote:

> The resolution and rationale are now posted at 
> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-new-gtld-13sep12-en.htm.
>  
> Greg Shatan
>  
>  
> Gregory S. Shatan 
> Deputy Chair| Tech Transactions Group 
> IP | Technology | Media 
> ReedSmithLLP 
> The business of relationships
> 599 Lexington Avenue
> New York, NY 10022
> 212.549.0275 | Phone
> 917.816.6428 | Mobile
> 212.521.5450 | Fax
> gshatan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.reedsmith.com 
> Abu Dhabi | Beijing | Century City | Chicago | 
> Dubai | Falls Church | Greece | Hong Kong | 
> London | Los Angeles | Munich | New York| 
> Paris | Philadelphia | Pittsburgh | Princeton | 
> Richmond | San Francisco | Shanghai |
> Silicon Valley | Washington DC | Wilmington
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Monday, September 17, 2012 3:27 AM
> To: Neuman, Jeff
> Cc: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] FW: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee 
> on the Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> Thanks for sending it on Jeff.
>  
> Cherine's note is obviously of great importance to this group. Please note 
> the deadline set by the Board for them to get a response from the GNSO and 
> adjust your work schedule accordingly.
>  
> If the group has a problem with either the deadline or the work it is being 
> asked to do here, please let the Council know asap.
>  
> Once again, my thanks to this group for its hard work on these issues.
>  
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM NetNames France
> ----------------
> Registry Relations and Strategy Director
> NetNames
> T: +33 (0)1 48 01 83 51
> F: +22 (0)1 48 01 83 61
> 
>  
> Le 17 sept. 2012 à 04:08, Neuman, Jeff a écrit :
> 
> 
> FYI.  I know this came out on Friday, but I am not sure this was sent to the 
> group. 
>  
> Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 
> 
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of David Olive
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 9:27 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Margie Milam
> Subject: [council] FW: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red 
> Cross/Red Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> For your information.
>  
> Regards,      David
>  
>  
> From: Cherine Chalaby 
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2012 1:32 PM
> To: stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Margie Milam; New gTLD Program Committee
> Subject: Update from The New gTLD Program Committee on the Red Cross/Red 
> Crescent and IOC Issues
>  
> Dear Stéphane,
> I wanted to reach out to you and the GNSO Council to let you know about an 
> issue of interest to the GNSO that the New gTLD Program Committee addressed 
> this week: the protection of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC names.  The 
> Committee passed a resolution yesterday requesting that the GNSO consider a 
> proposed solution for the first round to protect at the second level the 
> names of Red Cross/Red Crescent and IOC, consistent with the GAC advice to 
> the Board.
> We have been apprised of, and appreciate, the significant work currently 
> underway by the GNSO’s IOC/RC Drafting Team, and the potential PDP under 
> consideration.  We crafted the resolution in a way that recognises that GNSO 
> work is ongoing.  The resolution and the rationale will be posted next Monday.
> The Committee adopted this resolution now, rather than wait until Toronto, to 
> provide sufficient time for the GNSO to develop its views on this request 
> taking into account the timeline for the first round.   It is important that 
> this issue is resolved early next year so that additional protections, if 
> they are adopted, are in place for the first round.  As a result, the 
> Committee is seeking the GNSO’s response by January 31, 2013.
> We look forward to receiving the GNSO's response and are available to discuss 
> this issue in further detail in Toronto.    
> Sincerely,
> Cherine Chalaby
>  
> 
>  
> * * *
> This E-mail, along with any attachments, is considered confidential and may 
> well be legally privileged. If you have received it in error, you are on 
> notice of its status. Please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then 
> delete this message from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any 
> purposes, or disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your 
> cooperation.
> * * *
> To ensure compliance with Treasury Department regulations, we inform you 
> that, unless otherwise indicated in writing, any U.S. Federal tax advice 
> contained in this communication  (including any attachments) is not intended 
> or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding 
> penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or applicable state and local 
> provisions or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any 
> tax-related matters addressed herein.
> Disclaimer Version RS.US.20.10.00