<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO PDP WG Action Items
- To: gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO PDP WG Action Items
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:41:08 -0400
On 31 Oct 2012, at 20:39, Brian Peck wrote:
> <IGO-INGO_WG_WorkPlan_07NOV2012.doc>
As I indicated in my previous note where sent apologies due to conflict:
> One request I would like to make on the issues up-front is that the work
> items include doing impact analysis (rights, competition etc) on any
> recommendations made.
> I know this is in the defined PDP process, but many of the elements of the
> PDP are, for example the process to be used, yet we repeat them in the
> charters of WG. Until such time as impact analysis (rights, competition
> etc..) is an understood and expect element that needs no mention, I beleive
> it is critical that it be mentioned.
>
> In this case I expect that impact analysis goes beyond pro-forma but is
> substantive given the arguments of the RCRC and others related to to
> humanitarian principles, human rights and international law.
I will try to listen to the recording to understand why this request was
rejected.
In the meantime I request that the following be aded to the Mission and Scope
under elements for the final Report
- Impact analysis, including rights, competition and other , for any
recommendations made by the WG.
thanks
avri
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|