Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] Re: [gnso-igo-ingo] IGO-INGO PDP WG Action Items

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Avri, the request was not rejected. We didn't come anywhere near 
discussing the content of the charter with the exception of the 
concept of splitting into two groups and the need for an external 
legal review of laws/legislation.
Happy listening.

Alan

At 31/10/2012 09:41 PM, Avri Doria wrote:


> On 31 Oct 2012, at 20:39, Brian Peck wrote:
>
> > <IGO-INGO_WG_WorkPlan_07NOV2012.doc>
>
>
> As I indicated in my previous note where sent apologies due to conflict:
>
> > One request I would like to make on the issues up-front is that 
> the work items include doing impact analysis (rights, competition 
> etc) on any recommendations made.
> > I know this is in the defined PDP process, but many of the 
> elements of the PDP are, for example the process to be used, yet we 
> repeat them in the charters of WG.  Until such time as impact 
> analysis (rights, competition etc..) is an understood and expect 
> element that needs no mention, I beleive it is critical that it be mentioned.
> >
> > In this case I expect that impact analysis goes beyond pro-forma 
> but is substantive given the arguments of the RCRC and others 
> related to to humanitarian principles, human rights and international law.
> I will try to listen to the recording to understand why this request 
> was rejected.
> In the meantime I request that the following be aded to the Mission 
> and Scope under elements for the final Report
> - Impact analysis, including rights, competition and other , for any 
> recommendations made by the WG.
> thanks
>
> avri