Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Doesn't the "pending the outcome of the recently launched policy 
development process involving International Governmental and 
Non-governmental Organizations." cover this?
Alan

At 07/11/2012 10:57 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Should the motion be conditional, i.e., "if any policy 
> recommendations are not approved before new gTLDs are delegated"?
> Chuck
>
> From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
> Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:03 AM
> To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Motion for Discussion Today
>
> All,
>
> Assuming the Drafting Team has not changed its view on the 
> recommendations posted for public comment, I intend on sending in 
> this motion to the Council by the end of the day.  Lets discuss on 
> the call today. I know the reply period ends in 2 days, but the 
> motion needs to be filed today in order to be on the GNSO Council 
> agenda next week.
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
> Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: 
> +1.703.738.7965 / 
> <mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz