RE: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Maybe Alan but I am not sure.  It seems to me that that isn't very clear.

Chuck

From: Alan Greenberg [mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 12:24 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Neuman, Jeff; gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx; gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [gnso-iocrc-dt] RE: Proposed Motion for Discussion Today

Doesn't the "pending the outcome of the recently launched policy development 
process involving International Governmental and Non-governmental 
Organizations." cover this?

Alan

At 07/11/2012 10:57 AM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

Should the motion be conditional, i.e., ?if any policy recommendations are not 
approved before new gTLDs are delegated??

Chuck

From: owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx> [ 
mailto:owner-gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2012 10:03 AM
To: gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-iocrc-dt@xxxxxxxxx>; 
gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-igo-ingo@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-igo-ingo] Proposed Motion for Discussion Today

All,

Assuming the Drafting Team has not changed its view on the recommendations 
posted for public comment, I intend on sending in this motion to the Council by 
the end of the day.  Lets discuss on the call today. I know the reply period 
ends in 2 days, but the motion needs to be filed today in order to be on the 
GNSO Council agenda next week.

Thanks.



Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
46000 Center Oak Plaza, Sterling, VA 20166
Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx>   / 
www.neustar.biz<http://www.neustar.biz/>