RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

[berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

I support 5 calendar days.  Thank you.

Berry Cobb
Infinity Portals LLC
berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.infinityportals.com
866.921.8891

_______________________________________________

Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A  
domain name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar  
provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered  
Name Holder to remove the lock status.
Proposed modification of denial reason #7:
Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked  
pursuant to the Registrar?s published security policy or at the  
direction of the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar  
includes in its registration agreement the terms and conditions upon  
which it locks domains and further that the Registrar provides a  
readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder  
to remove the lock status. If the Registrar does not provide a means  
to allow a Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status  
themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing the lock within 5  
calendar days / 5 working days / 10 business days of receiving a  
request from the Registered Name Holder.
Questions for the members of the WG:

1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason #7?
?	If yes, please indicate which timeframe you would support: 5  
calendar days, 5 working days or 10 business days
?	If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do not support the  
proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative  
recommendation for consideration