ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E

  • To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 14:05:08 -0700

<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000; 
font-size:10pt;"><div>Support with the timeframe of 5 -calendar- 
days.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks--</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid 
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; 
font-family: verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Your feedback requested - Issue E<br>
From: Marika Konings &lt;marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx&gt;<br>
Date: Wed, May 05, 2010 3:16 am<br>
To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" &lt;Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx&gt;<br>
<br>
    <font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span style="font-size: 
11pt;"><b>Issue E: Whether, and if so, how best to clarify denial reason #7: A 
domain name was already in "lock status" provided that the Registrar provides a 
readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to 
remove the lock status.<br> <br> Proposed modification of denial reason #7:</b> 
<br> <i>Prior to receipt of the transfer request, the domain name was locked 
pursuant to the Registrar’s published security policy or at the direction of 
the Registered Name Holder provided that the Registrar includes in its 
registration agreement the terms and conditions upon which it locks domains and 
further that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable means 
for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status. If the Registrar does 
not provide a means to allow a Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status 
themselves, then Registrar must facilitate removing the lock within 5 calendar 
days / 5 working days / 10 business days of receiving a request from the 
Registered Name Holder.<br> </i><br> Questions for the members of the WG:<br> 
<br> 1/ Do you support the proposed modification to change denial reason 
#7?<br> </span></font><ul><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, 
Arial"><span style="font-size: 11pt;">If yes, please indicate which timeframe 
you would support: 5 calendar days, 5 working days or 10 business days 
</span></font></li><li><font face="Calibri, Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><span 
style="font-size: 11pt;">If no, please provide your feedback as to why you do 
not support the proposed modification and, if possible, provide an alternative 
recommendation for consideration</span></font></li></ul>   
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy