[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Recommended Modifications to the Latest ERTP Recommendation
All, I have incorporated my recommended modifications into the latest version of the document. Because this proposed policy is intended to augment existing policies, I have deleted the language relating to option to dispute a disputed ERTP using the TDRP. Also, the registries will not want to be in the middle of the communications that ensue between the PTRa and the new Registrar should the new Registrar elect to dispute the ERTP. The registries would add little to no value in that activity. To the extent that the PTRa, upon receipt of a Disputed ERTP case from the new Registrar, agrees that the domain name should not have been transferred via the ETRP, then they would forward the Disputed TDRP to the appropriate Registry Operator and the Registry Operator would restore the domain name to the new Registrar within 5 days (I changed this from 30 days as the IRTP calls for the following in Part A, Section 6: "The Registry Operator must undo the transfer within five (5) calendar days of receipt of the notice except in the case of a Registry dispute decision, in which case the Registry Operator must undo the transfer within fourteen calendar days unless a court action is filed. The notice required shall be one of the following: i. Agreement of the Registrar of Record and the Gaining Registrar sent by email, letter or fax that the transfer was made by mistake or was otherwise not in accordance with the procedures set forth in this policy; ii. The final determination of a dispute resolution body having jurisdiction over the transfer; or iii. Order of a court having jurisdiction over the transfer." Please let me know if any of my recommended edits do not make sense. Many thanks. Barbara Steele Compliance Officer / Director of Policy VerSign, Inc. Attachment:
ETRP definition tightening-BKS Edits.doc Attachment:
smime.p7s
|