ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For final review - IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report

  • To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For final review - IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:40:29 -0700

Dear All,

Please find posted on the wiki (https://st.icann.org/irtp-partb/) for final 
review the IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report. To facilitate your review, I have 
posted both a redline as well as a clean version. As discussed on our call 
yesterday, the main changes include:


 *   The following paragraph in relation to the ETRP dispute resolution 
mechanism has been added: The WG agrees that there should be a mechanism to 
dispute an ETRP but has not reached agreement on how such a mechanism might 
work. The WG hopes to receive further input during the public comment period on 
the elements an ETRP dispute mechanism should contain and whether it should be 
an integral part of the ETRP or another existing dispute resolution mechanism 
e.g. the TDRP. This paragraph has replaced provision 5 of the proposed ETRP.
 *   The modified version of recommendation D as proposed by Mikey to clarify 
the previous version (no substance change)
 *   Included the provision related to registrant title as a minority view: 
Minority viewpoint – one member of the WG supported adding the following 
provision to section 3.1 of the proposed ETRP: The PTRa shall distribute a 
Registrant's Title to each Registrant in a communication directly to the 
Registrant without notice to any of the other contacts noted in the associated 
WHOIS records, including the Administrative Contact. Such a Registrant's Title 
shall include a unique identifier as determined by the Registrar for the 
purpose of providing the Registrant with a mechanism for identification as the 
Registrant.
 *   Included attendance information

Please share any comments / edits / suggestions you may have with the mailing 
list as soon as possible, but at the latest by close of business (wherever you 
are) on Friday 28 May. Following that the Initial Report will be posted and 
submitted to the GNSO Council. As discussed, the public comment forum will open 
for a period of 20 days, as prescribed by the ICANN by-laws, after the ICANN 
meeting in Brussels (proposed start date: 5 July).

Thanks,

Marika





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy