<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For final review - IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report
- To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For final review - IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report
- From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 02:40:29 -0700
Dear All,
Please find posted on the wiki (https://st.icann.org/irtp-partb/) for final
review the IRTP Part B PDP Initial Report. To facilitate your review, I have
posted both a redline as well as a clean version. As discussed on our call
yesterday, the main changes include:
* The following paragraph in relation to the ETRP dispute resolution
mechanism has been added: The WG agrees that there should be a mechanism to
dispute an ETRP but has not reached agreement on how such a mechanism might
work. The WG hopes to receive further input during the public comment period on
the elements an ETRP dispute mechanism should contain and whether it should be
an integral part of the ETRP or another existing dispute resolution mechanism
e.g. the TDRP. This paragraph has replaced provision 5 of the proposed ETRP.
* The modified version of recommendation D as proposed by Mikey to clarify
the previous version (no substance change)
* Included the provision related to registrant title as a minority view:
Minority viewpoint – one member of the WG supported adding the following
provision to section 3.1 of the proposed ETRP: The PTRa shall distribute a
Registrant's Title to each Registrant in a communication directly to the
Registrant without notice to any of the other contacts noted in the associated
WHOIS records, including the Administrative Contact. Such a Registrant's Title
shall include a unique identifier as determined by the Registrar for the
purpose of providing the Registrant with a mechanism for identification as the
Registrant.
* Included attendance information
Please share any comments / edits / suggestions you may have with the mailing
list as soon as possible, but at the latest by close of business (wherever you
are) on Friday 28 May. Following that the Initial Report will be posted and
submitted to the GNSO Council. As discussed, the public comment forum will open
for a period of 20 days, as prescribed by the ICANN by-laws, after the ICANN
meeting in Brussels (proposed start date: 5 July).
Thanks,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|