ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Response from ICANN Compliance re. impact of voluntarily language on 60 day lock

  • To: "'Diaz, Paul'" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Response from ICANN Compliance re. impact of voluntarily language on 60 day lock
  • From: "Rob Golding" <rob.golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 19:16:13 +0100

> Registrant email address is NOT a required field in COM/NET

Registrars must collect and provide public access to domain name registrant
data, including name, address, phone, fax and email.
  (Registrar Accreditation Agreement Section II (F))

Surely TLD is irrelevant - they're mandatory requirements for all domain
registrations ;)

> We share the pain re: the hassle of acquiring the necessary contact
> information, but need to weigh the convenience vs. security aspects of
> any potential changes to the current framework

At the point of a transfer starting, registrars can/do/must validate the EPP
transfer code - perhaps as the point of EPP from its name is *extensible* we
should be agreeing a "get contacts" extension to retrieve them from the
current registrar at that point - this eliminating the potential "scraping"
errors or potential "internal hijack" of a domain ?

Regards,
Rob
--
e:Rob.Golding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx   http://www.othellotech.net  ; t:0871 277 6875
Othello Technology Systems Ltd, Number One Poultry, London, EC2R 8JR UK
Registered in England (UK), Company #03894981, VAT #782561410, DPR#Z7269672
Business Internet Service Provider AS29527 since 1996
adsl : domains : email : hosting : vps : cloud : colo : servers : iptransit
: backups/dr

24/7/365 Support, Community Forums and Blog at
http://support.othellotech.net








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy