RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed agenda IRTP Part B WG meeting
One more nugget of joy for 2nd Hour Berry Cobb Infinity Portals LLC berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://infinityportals.com 720.839.5735 From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Berry Cobb Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 8:55 PM To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed agenda IRTP Part B WG meeting For the 2nd Hour Team & All of IRTP-B for that matter, I apologize for not getting this out in time for review before our call. 30 lashes to me! Here is a revised agenda for the 2nd Hour: 1. Recap last week?s discussion and proposals 2. Review Mikey?s eTRP Diagram (ps, I started a swimlame version too) 3. Review survey results spreadsheet 2nd Hour Take-Aways from 4 Jan 2011 (Please feel free to add to the list if I misstated or omitted anything): · Agreement to keep eTRP but modify to prevent misuse and gaming · Possible enhancements: o Ensure rapid restore of domain is maintained, and domain becomes locked o shorter timeline for filing complaint (60 days to perhaps 7 days or shorter?) o option for the other side to state their case, ?due process? o independent third party to administer the process (can't be the previous registrar as that party is not impartial) o better define eTRP process as not a dispute resolution tool, it only interfaces to IRTP & TDRP o Create education for parties on how to handle complaints and interact o Also include the 60 day lock WRT to Denial Reason #9 § Objective is to slow down or minimize hops common to hi-jacks § If this were to become consensus policy, it is a fall back for Registrars to mitigate customer dissatisfaction o Determine how the Change of Registrant or Reducing Admin Contact authority recommendations, if made will affect eTRP Mikey mentioned two layers of remediation of Transfer issue: 1. Registrar to Registrar ? informal cooperation 2. Registrar to Registrar ? TDRP with ICANN involved I came across other material and I think there are additional layers that perhaps should be documented within the final report: 1. Registrant to PTRr ? Registrar denies dispute 2. PTRr to PTRa ? informal cooperation 3. PTRr to PTRa w/ ICANN ? via TDRP 4. Registry Specific Reassignment Service - ß This is new to me 5. Law Enforcement / Courts See you all tomorrow morning! Berry Cobb Infinity Portals LLC berrycobb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://infinityportals.com 720.839.5735 From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 3:24 AM To: Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed agenda IRTP Part B WG meeting Dear All, Please find below the proposed agenda for tomorrow's IRTP Part B WG meeting. With best regards, Marika Proposed Agenda ? IRTP Part B WG Meeting ? 11 January 2011 1st hour ? 15.00 ? 16.00 UTC 1. Roll Call / Update SOI-DOI 2. Continue discussion on recommendations (please review updated recommendations overview) 3. For review - EPP Status Values Overview (see attached) 4. Next steps & confirm next meeting 2nd hour ? 16.00 ? 17.00 UTC 5. Continue discussion and refinement of ETRP (action items from last week's meeting: Review Mikey's flowchart and Berry's analysis of ETRP survey results ? both attached) 6. Next steps Remaining Action Items IRTP Part B WG meeting 21 December * Circulate relevant section from transcript of WHOIS session in Sydney during which inconsistencies with the UDRP provision relating to locking of a domain name was discussed (James) * Circulate overview and definition of EPP status values document for WG input (Marika ? attached in this email) Attachment:
etrp_Swimlane_v0.1.pdf
|