<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed slides for review
- To: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed slides for review
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 13:25:15 -0700
Marika and Team:
Feedback below--
Thank you!
J.
***********
Community Slides:
Slide 6, Item #1: Could add some language at the end. "This Emergency
Action Channel could also be used for non-transfer abuse issues."
Slide 7, Item #3: It's been a while since we examined this. Can we
confirm that the DAG (or AGB or whatever) still does not contain this
requirement?
Item #7 appears on both Slide 8 and Slide 9
***********
Council Slides:
Item #7 appears on both Slide 7 and Slide 8.
***********
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] Proposed slides for review
From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, March 01, 2011 1:42 pm
To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
Dear All,
Please find attached the proposed slides for the two presentations the
IRTP Part B WG has planned in San Francisco (update to the GNSO Council
and presentation of the report to the GNSO Community). The two
presentations are to a large extend the same, but there is less
background information in the GNSO Council update as I provided a WG
status update at the last Council meeting. Please feel free to share
your comments on the mailing list and/or our next call on Tuesday 8
March.
Thanks,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|