ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For your review - Draft Proposals IRTP Reason for Denial #7 and WHOIS Status messages

  • To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For your review - Draft Proposals IRTP Reason for Denial #7 and WHOIS Status messages
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:44:55 -0700

Dear All,

Following the adoption by the GNSO Council of the following resolved clauses 
(see below and http://gnso/resolutions/#201106), you will find attached two 
draft proposals prepared by ICANN Staff. Before putting these out for public 
comment, we would like to get the feedback of the IRTP Part B Working Group. 
Please feel free to share your comments, suggestions and/or questions with the 
mailing list. If needed or preferred, we can also schedule a conference call to 
discuss in further detail.

I look forward to receiving your feedback.

With best regards,

Marika

>From Motion 1 on the Adoption of the IRTP Part B Final Report and 
>Recommendations (see http://gnso/resolutions/#201106):

RESOLVED (D), prior to the consideration of approval of the recommendation 
which states: "denial reason #7 should be replaced by adding a new provision in 
a different section of the IRTP on when and how domains may be locked or 
unlocked", the GNSO Council requests ICANN Staff to provide a proposal for such 
a new provision, taking into account the IRTP Part B WG deliberations in 
relation to this issue (see IRTP Part B Final Report - (Recommendation #9 - 
part 2). Upon review of the proposal, the GNSO Council will consider whether to 
approve the recommendation.

RESOLVED (E), prior to the consideration of approval of the recommendation 
regarding the standardizing and clarifying WHOIS status messages regarding 
Registrar Lock status, the GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to provide a 
proposal designed to ensure a technically feasible approach can be developed to 
meet this recommendation. Staff should take into account the IRTP Part B WG 
deliberations in relation to this issue (see IRTP Part B Final Report). (IRTP 
Part B Recommendation #8). The goal of these changes is to clarify why the Lock 
has been applied and how it can be changed. Upon review of the proposed plan, 
the GNSO Council will consider whether to approve the recommendation.

Attachment: IRTP Reason for Denial #7 - Draft Proposal - 5 September 2011.pdf
Description: IRTP Reason for Denial #7 - Draft Proposal - 5 September 2011.pdf

Attachment: IRTP Recommendation #8 - Draft Proposal - 5 September 2011.pdf
Description: IRTP Recommendation #8 - Draft Proposal - 5 September 2011.pdf



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy