RE: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] IRTP Part B Working Meeting on Tuesday 27 September at 14.00 UTC

["Sedo :: Simonetta Batteiger" <simonetta@xxxxxxxx>]

I'm unsure if I will be able to dial into tomorrow's call, but I'm fine with 
the proposed language.
Simonetta

From: owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 6:48 AM
To: Marika Konings; Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: REMINDER: Re: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] IRTP Part B Working Meeting on 
Tuesday 27 September at 14.00 UTC

Reminder: For those of you that have not done so yet, and especially if you are 
not able to attend the meeting, please share your comments, questions and/or 
suggestions with the mailing list ahead of tomorrow's meeting.

Thanks,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 02:08:22 -0700
To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] IRTP Part B Working Meeting on Tuesday 27 
September at 14.00 UTC

Dear All,

Michele has requested that the IRTP Part B Working Group reconvenes to discuss 
the attached proposals on Tuesday 27 September at 14.00 UTC (please let me know 
if this time/day does not work for you). For those of you that have not done so 
yet, please feel free to share your views, comments and /or questions with the 
mailing list. If there are any questions you have for staff who have been 
involved in preparing these proposals, please share these prior to the call so 
I can take these back and hopefully provide you with an answer during the call 
itself.

With best regards,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 07:44:55 -0700
To: "Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:Gnso-irtp-b-jun09@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-irtp-b-jun09] For your review - Draft Proposals IRTP Reason for 
Denial #7 and WHOIS Status messages

Dear All,

Following the adoption by the GNSO Council of the following resolved clauses 
(see below and http://gnso/resolutions/#201106), you will find attached two 
draft proposals prepared by ICANN Staff. Before putting these out for public 
comment, we would like to get the feedback of the IRTP Part B Working Group. 
Please feel free to share your comments, suggestions and/or questions with the 
mailing list. If needed or preferred, we can also schedule a conference call to 
discuss in further detail.

I look forward to receiving your feedback.

With best regards,

Marika

>From Motion 1 on the Adoption of the IRTP Part B Final Report and 
>Recommendations (see http://gnso/resolutions/#201106):

RESOLVED (D), prior to the consideration of approval of the recommendation 
which states: "denial reason #7 should be replaced by adding a new provision in 
a different section of the IRTP on when and how domains may be locked or 
unlocked", the GNSO Council requests ICANN Staff to provide a proposal for such 
a new provision, taking into account the IRTP Part B WG deliberations in 
relation to this issue (see IRTP Part B Final Report - (Recommendation #9 - 
part 2). Upon review of the proposal, the GNSO Council will consider whether to 
approve the recommendation.

RESOLVED (E), prior to the consideration of approval of the recommendation 
regarding the standardizing and clarifying WHOIS status messages regarding 
Registrar Lock status, the GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to provide a 
proposal designed to ensure a technically feasible approach can be developed to 
meet this recommendation. Staff should take into account the IRTP Part B WG 
deliberations in relation to this issue (see IRTP Part B Final Report). (IRTP 
Part B Recommendation #8). The goal of these changes is to clarify why the Lock 
has been applied and how it can be changed. Upon review of the proposed plan, 
the GNSO Council will consider whether to approve the recommendation.