RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] RE: 10/28 call and moving forward

["Diaz, Paul" <pdiaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Chuck, Avri & IRTP PDP A WG participants,

The IRTP PDP A session will be held on Sunday @ 11:15 Cairo time.
Marika and I will update the Council; any other WG participants are most
welcome to join in the discussion.

Since that time slot is 4:15 AM EST, I don't expect many folks not
already in Cairo to dial in.  My note below was only meant to remind WG
participants that we will not be meeting on our regular time slot (1400
UTC) this coming Tuesday (11/4) - as we had previously agreed as a
group.  There was some confusion about today's call; I was just trying
to set things straight.  Sorry if I made things more confusing.

Regards, P

-----Original Message-----
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Diaz, Paul; Gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Michael Collins; Avri Doria
Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] RE: 10/28 call and moving forward

Paul,

Am I understanding you correctly: Are you saying that the IRTP PDP A
open session scheduled for Sunday, November 2nd (11:15-12:15 Cairo time)
will not be held?  Or are you saying the the WG will not hold a separate
meeting?

Even if the WG cannot meet, there may still be value in having someone
give an update in the GNSO working session.  Please note that I cc'd
Avri so that she is kept aware.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Diaz, Paul
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:46 AM
> To: Gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Michael Collins
> Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] RE: 10/28 call and moving forward
> 
> 
> Just to be clear:
> 
> We will not have an IRTP WG meeting next week in Cairo.  If 
> any WG participants want to informally discuss IRTP PDP A 
> issues, we can do that on the margins of other ICANN sessions.
> 
> WG participants are encouraged, however, to take the time 
> between now and our next call on November 11, 2008 to 
> carefully go through the draft Initial Report and offer any 
> suggested changes on this mailing list.  We will go through 
> the draft report on 11/11 and work hard to get the report 
> ready for posting so we can start the public comment 
> period/call for constituency statements.
> 
> Regards, P
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Collins [mailto:michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:37 AM
> To: Diaz, Paul; 'Gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] RE: 10/28 call and moving forward
> 
> Paul and all, 
> 
> I apologize, I was ill last week and did not make the call. 
> However, I did not see a notice of this week's call and 
> presumed that the meeting in Cairo replace the call. Sorry.
> 
> Best regards,
> Michael Collins
> Executive Director
> Internet Commerce Association
> +1. 202 657 4570
> +1. 407 242 9009 mobile
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Diaz, Paul
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: Gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-irtp-pdp-jun08] RE: 10/28 call and moving forward
> 
> 
> We did not have a quorum on today's IRTP PDP A WG call, so we 
> did not go through the draft Initial Report.  If you know you 
> will not be able to attend a call, please remember to send 
> Glen or me your regrets.
> 
> As noted on today's recording, all WG participants are 
> strongly encouraged to go through the 10/28/08 draft report 
> that is posted on our wiki (see 
> https://st.icann.org/irtp_jun08_pdp-wg/index.cgi?irtp_part_a_p
> dp_wg_pdp_
> jun08).  Feel free to raise any questions or offer suggested 
> text edits on this mailing list.  Marika will incorporate 
> those in a revised draft ahead of our next call (11/11/08).
> 
> Our first order of business on November 11, 20008 will be to 
> go through the most current draft.  Once WG participant's 
> concerns have been addressed and there is consensus within 
> the group that the Initial Report is ready for posting, we'll 
> get it out to the community so we can open the public comment 
> period and call for constituency statements.
> The WG will continue to work on the issues in parallel with 
> the comment period.
> 
> Although our timeline has slipped a few weeks, we may still 
> be able to wrap up this work by the end of December 2008 or 
> early January 2009.
> 
> Regards, P
> 
> 
>