<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-irtpc] Commitment to Participate
- To: "Volker Greimann" <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Phil Corwin" <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] Commitment to Participate
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:56:55 -0700
<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000;
font-size:10pt;"><div>Thank you, Volker and Phil. Your comments are noted
and I respect your positions on this.</div><div><br></div><div>Please note that
this is not an ICANN-sanctioned concept, so all credit & scorn should be
directed solely at me.</div><div><br>J.</div><div><br></div>
<blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid
blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size:10pt; color:black;
font-family:verdana;">
<div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
-------- Original Message --------<br>
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpc] Commitment to Participate<br>
From: Volker Greimann <<a
href="mailto:vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx";>vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Date: Tue, December 13, 2011 9:45 am<br>
To: Phil Corwin <<a href="mailto:psc@xxxxxxxxxxx";>psc@xxxxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
Cc: "James M. Bladel" <<a
href="mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx";>jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx</a>>, IRTPC Working
Group<br>
<<a href="mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx";>gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx</a>><br>
<br>
I must agree with Phil. Even though I fully intend to participate fully, <br>
I cannot turn this into a guarantee, as my daily work responsibilities <br>
must take precedent and cannot always be predicted as accurately as I <br>
would hope.<br>
<br>
Also, what would be the penalties for violation a commitment that cannot <br>
be upheld at a later time?<br>
<br>
Volker<br>
> Sorry to be an outlier, but I do not support the general concept of
requesting members of any ICANN working group to take a formal commitment in
regard to their uncompensated volunteer participation.<br>
><br>
> That does not mean that I don't take this WG's work seriously or am
unaware of the aggressive work schedule -- my participation in every call since
the WG was convened speaks to that. I intend to participate in every future
call unless unavoidable client work or other commitments prevent that.<br>
><br>
> I will also be responsive to inquiries when I think I have something
meaningful to add. At this early stage I really can't estimate the division of
my time between monitoring and active participation -- it depends on how things
develop as we get into the details (although those who have worked with me in
other ICANN contexts know that I am not shy about expressing myself).<br>
><br>
> So, again, as a consenting adult volunteer I trust that my participation
will speak for itself -- I just don't support setting the precedent of
requesting participants in ICANN WGs to undertake formal commitments regarding
the degree of their participation.<br>
><br>
><br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|