<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-irtpc] here are the notes i took on the ideal-process stuff
- To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-irtpc] here are the notes i took on the ideal-process stuff
- From: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:56:28 -0500
Notes on principles from 10-Apr all WG call
2
"first"? do we want this to replace registrar processes? uniformity
vs variety/competition. "if the registrar didn't offer the function"
maybe eliminate the word "first"
4
"preauthorization" might be a way to ease the process problems
authorization is preferred to notification -- on the call
5
adds who is responsible for obtaining authorization
registrants don't know destination-registrar? they may not care. how
do you differentiate cases?
when coa is from a court order/udrp?
Thick/thin registry
four entities involved in a coa --
maybe identify a sequence of irtp/coa
9
is coa an additional section of the policy, or part of the irtp
FOA templates are mandated -- ICANN provides templates
language hasn't changed in several years -- maybe a broader issue
scope issue
general
'old' maybe change to 'previous' registrant
- - - - - - - - -
phone 651-647-6109
fax 866-280-2356
web http://www.haven2.com
handle OConnorStP (ID for public places like Twitter, Facebook, Google, etc.)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|