Re: [gnso-irtpc] For your review - updated recommendation charter question A

[Bob Mountain <bmountain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello All,
Some suggested edits to Charter Question "A", specifically concerning the 
60-day transfer lock question.
Mtn.


--
Bob Mountain
Senior Vice President
Business Development
[cid:9F696FD4-E9C1-427D-B0C8-E6F83C4FFF89]
E: mtn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bmountain@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
P: +1 781.839.2871    F: +1 781.839.2801  C: +1 508-878-0469

Visit us at NameMedia.com<http://www.namemedia.com/>

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and any documents attached to it may 
contain confidential or proprietary information or content. The transmission is 
intended solely for the information or use of the individuals addressed, or 
copied, as intended recipients. If you are not a named recipient, or you were 
otherwise sent this by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, 
copying, distribution or taking of any action as a result of or in reliance on 
the contents of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If this message has been 
received in error, please delete it immediately and notify the sender by return 
e-mail. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.


From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 5:42 AM
To: IRTPC Working Group <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [gnso-irtpc] For your review - updated recommendation charter question 
A

Dear All,

Please find attached for your review an updated draft of the proposed language 
for the recommendation in relation to Charter Question A. Changes in this draft 
include:

  *   Clarifying that authorization for change of registrant can also be 
provided in the form of pre-authorization or proxy
  *   Outlining that there are two views with regard to whether restrictions 
are required to prevent a change of registrar immediately following a change of 
registrant (Bob/Simonetta, please provide some proposed language to reflect the 
view for no restrictions. I've used Mikey's email as a basis for the 
pro-restriction view)
  *   Corrected terminology as prior and new registrant (as previously agreed)

One other outstanding question is whether the WG has a preferred option for 
incorporating this new policy (separate policy, combined policy, hybrid policy 
– see explanation in the document). It might be helpful to give an indication 
of which direction the WG is leaning in the Initial Report, even if it is not a 
consensus / final view.

Please share your comments / edits with the mailing list as soon as possible. 
The objective is still to meet the publication deadline for Prague (1 June).

With best regards,

Marika

Attachment: binPXH4DuPI2i.bin
Description: application/applefile

Attachment: Recommendation Charter Question A - Updated 23 May 2012 - mtn Edits.doc
Description: Recommendation Charter Question A - Updated 23 May 2012 - mtn Edits.doc