<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-irtpc] a first-draft picture of four major use cases
- To: "'IRTPC Working Group'" <gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-irtpc] a first-draft picture of four major use cases
- From: "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 09:09:21 -0700
Team,
For reference, here are links to process documents used in IRTP-A:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpa/What+is+EPP
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpa/Transfer+in+an+EPP+Registry
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpa/Registry+Requirements
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpa/Registrar+Of+Record+Requiremen
ts
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsoirtpa/Other+Examples
Berry Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
@berrycobb
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-irtpc@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike O'Connor
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 06:40
To: IRTPC Working Group
Subject: [gnso-irtpc] a first-draft picture of four major use cases
hi all,
sorry this is coming sooo close to the meeting. i drew this late last week
and then. forgot. :-(
anyway, i had a go at four use cases.
the first two are the "normal" ones. the customer is either transferring to
a new registrar OR to a new registrant.
the next two are the "change registrar and registrant at the same time"
ones, one that preserves the locking safeguard and one that lets the losing
registrant disable the lock
my idea is that all of these can be "instantaneous" once all the
authentication is done, even though they actually happen as separate events.
see whatcha think.
mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|