<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-irtpd] First draft on Locking Language
- To: "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] First draft on Locking Language
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 15:35:41 +0000
Mikey & Team:
Excellent stuff, and I'm happy to lead the discussion of initial
recommendations based on Mikey's report. However, I thought there were other
(or at least one) other draft floating out on the list? We should make sure
any of those edits are captured here also.
Talk with you in a few minutes...
J.
From: Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, February 3, 2014 at 7:56
To: "gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>"
<gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso-irtpd@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [gnso-irtpd] First draft on Locking Language
hi all,
sorry this is so late - the week kinda ran away from me.
i bashed through the "recommendations" portion of the report and gave it a bit
of a scrub. we can use this as the basis of the call today if you want.
mikey
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|