[gnso-lockpdp-wg] FW: UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey - Follow up questions

["Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Team,

 

Here is one detailed response from the Czech Arbitration Court.  See the thread 
below for specific responses.

 

Thank you.  B

 

Berry Cobb

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)

720.839.5735

 <mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

@berrycobb

 

Begin forwarded message:

From: Tereza Bartošková <tereza.bartoskova@xxxxxx>
Date: 1 Aug 2012 19:30:35 GMT+09:30
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Margie Milam <Margie.Milam@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey - Follow up questions

Dear Marika and Margie, 

 

please find our additional answers in the below text.

 

Kind regards,

 

Tereza

Tereza Bartoskova


  _____  


From: Marika Konings [mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 2:48 PM
To: Beckham, Brian; Roache-Turner, David; Dorrain, Kristine; Dennis Cai; Tereza 
Bartošková
Subject: UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey - Follow up questions

 

Thank you very much for participating in the UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey. 
Following review of the responses received from all the UDRP providers, the WG 
would be interested to know whether it would be possible for you to provide a 
further breakdown in relation to the specific questions listed below so that 
the WG is able to determine whether the real number is closer to 0% than 25%, 
or to 100% than 75%. If possible, please complete the 'new response' for each 
of the questions and send these back to me.

 

If you are interested to review the responses to the survey, please see 
https://community.icann.org/x/l6-bAQ. 

 

With best regards,

 

Marika

4.  In approximately what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you handle do 
registrars lock the domain name(s) at issue taken on a representative sample of 
UDRP disputes that you have had experience with?

Current response: More than 75%: 4

New response: More than 75%, please specify: About 90 %

5. In approximately what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you handle do 
registrars fail to confirm lock of the domain name(s) at issue for purposes of 
the UDRP dispute within five(5) days of your sending a provider verification 
request to the concerned registrar, taken on a representative sample of UDRP 
disputes that you have had experience with?

Current response: Less than 25%: 3

New response, please specify: Between 25-30 %

8.  In approximately what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you have 
administered are you aware of the registrar having confirmed lock of a domain 
name in reply to a request for registrar verification from you, but in which 
there were nonetheless subsequent material changes to the registrant data which 
impacted administration of the UDRP dispute?

Current response: Less than 25%: 3 & Free-text 1: Less than 5%

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: There was no such case in fact as 
there were only cases (app. 1 %) where the registrar provided verification but 
did not expressly confirm locking and subsequently transferred the domain name 
(though we are not sure if you consider transfer to amount to “change to the 
registrant data”). It should be also noted that we usually do not check the 
whois data during the dispute so possibly there were more such cases but we 
didn’t find out.

12.  In approximately what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you have 
administered are you aware of the registrar’s confirmed domain name lock 
failing to prevent an apparently prohibited (e.g. under UDRP paragraph 8(b)) 
transfer to another registrar during pendency of a UDRP proceeding.

Current response: Less than 25%: 2 & Free-text 1: Less than 5% & Free-text 2: 
This only happened in cases where the registrar provided verification but did 
not expressly confirm locking

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: There was no such case in fact as 
there were only cases (app. 1 %) where the registrar provided verification but 
did not expressly confirm locking and subsequently transferred the domain name 
to both another registrar and registrant. 

13.  In what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you have administered are you 
aware of the registrar’s confirmed domain name lock having failed to prevent an 
apparently prohibited (e.g. under UDRP paragraph 8(a)) transfer of a domain 
name registration to another registrant.

Current response: Less than 25%: 2 & Free-text 1: Less than 5% & Free-text 1: 
This only happened in cases where the registrar provided verification but did 
not expressly confirm locking

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: There was no such case in fact as 
there were only cases (app. 1 %) where the registrar provided verification but 
did not expressly confirm locking and subsequently transferred the domain name 
to both another registrar and registrant.

14.  In what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you have administered are you 
aware of the registrar’s confirmed domain name lock having failed to prevent 
modification of any materially relevant WHOIS data, e.g. registrant contact 
information?

Current responses: Less than 25%: 3 - Free-text 1: Requested data not available

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: 0% - we are not aware of any such 
case as we usually do not check the whois data during the dispute so possibly 
there were such cases but we didn’t find out.

16. In approximately what percentage of UDRP proceedings that you have 
administered are you aware of a registrar's confirmed domain name lock pursuant 
to a UDRP proceeding having apparently prevented expiration (e.g. registrar 
confirms no further steps necessary to keep domain name “active” and subject to 
UDRP proceedings) of a domain name that passes its expiration date (without 
renewal) while a UDRP proceeding is pending (or in the 10/15 day "wait period" 
thereafter) (e.g. registrar does not appear to require payment by either UDRP 
party pursuant to the Expired Domain Deletion Policy (EDDP) to keep the 
disputed domain name “active” and subject to the UDRP proceeding)?

Current response: Less than 25%: 3 & Free-text 1: Requested data not available

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: 0%

18. If a UDRP proceeding is decided in favor of the registrant, in what 
percentage of cases are you aware of where the registrar would not have 
unlocked the domain name once the 15 day ‘wait’ period has expired?

Current response: Less than 25%: 3 & Free-text 1: Requested data not available

New response: Less than 25%, please specify: 0%

 



__________ Informace od ESET Endpoint Antivirus, verze databaze 7345 (20120801) 
__________

Tuto zpravu proveril ESET Endpoint Antivirus.

http://www.eset.cz