<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Agenda for 02 August 2012
- To: "Juan Manuel Rojas" <jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>, owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx, "marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Agenda for 02 August 2012
- From: gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 11:20:27 +0000
Dear all,
I am apologizing too for today.
I won't be able to make it.
Gabriela Szlak
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
-----Original Message-----
From: Juan Manuel Rojas <jumaropi@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2012 06:16:50
To: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx><Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Agenda for 02 August 2012
Dear all
Please apologize me. I won't be able to join today's call. I am finishing
another meeting at start time of our Call.
Best Regards
Juan Manuel Rojas
Sent from my iPhone
On 1/08/2012, at 21:04, "Berry Cobb" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Team,
>
>
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the 2 Aug 2012, 14:00 UTC UDRP
> Domain Name Lock WG meeting.
>
>
>
> With best regards,
>
>
>
> B
>
>
>
> Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group – 02 August 2012
>
>
>
> 1. Roll Call / SOI
>
> 2. Continue review of survey responses and discuss possible conclusions
> to be derived from the study
>
> a. Zoomerang Final PDFs and Summary Findings Work Products (sent
> previously)
>
> b. UDRP Domain Name Lock Survey - Follow up questions (if submitted)
>
> c. Attached spreadsheets (see below)
>
> 3. Discuss next steps on charter requirements
>
> 4. Next steps / confirm next meeting for 16 August 2012
>
>
>
> One comment has been submitted to the Public Comment Forum:
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/udrp-locking/
>
> The window closes September 5th 2012.
>
>
>
> Attached Spreadsheets:
>
> I attempted to dump the survey results into a spreadsheet divided by
> Registrar Responses and UDRP Provider Responses. Given only four responses
> from the UDRP providers, I doubt much value is gained because the trends can
> be seen pretty easily in the PDFs. However, in the Registrar responses,
> perhaps a few comparison trends can be found.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Berry Cobb
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
>
> 720.839.5735
>
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> @berrycobb
>
>
>
>
>
> <Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings - UDRP
> Providers-analysis.xlsx>
> <Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings Survey -
> Registrars_analysis.xlsx>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|