Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG

[Luc SEUFER <lseufer@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello Kristine,

Just a minor change to the proposed wording to avoid any confusion regarding 
the fact that the Registrar may not be the name server provider and as such may 
not guarantee that the name will continue to resolve, but only that the name 
servers registered for the domain name will not be modified by the registrar 
(and not the other way around).


"Unless otherwise seth forth in the UDRP Policy and/or UDRP Rules, the 
registrar shall restrict all changes to the registration data, including the 
data displayed in the publicly available Whois database, and including transfer 
and deletion of the domain names, as well as the name servers on which the name 
is hosted."

Best Wishes,

Luc
______________________
Luc Seufer

Chief Legal Officer
DCL Group
2, rue Léon Laval
L-3372 Leudelange



Tel.:  +352  27 220 166
Mobile : +352 691 600 417
Fax.:   +352 20 300 166
Mailto:lseufer@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lseufer@xxxxxxxxxxx>







www.datacenter.eu<http://www.datacenter.eu/>   | 
www.eurodns.com<http://www.eurodns.com/>   | 
www.voipgate.com<http://www.voipgate.com/> | 
www.luxcloud.com<http://www.luxcloud.com/>

On 29 août 2012, at 23:38, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight 
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:


Kristine

Thanks for that.

Just to make discussion of this easier I'm copying the text of the document 
into this email:


"Proposed UDRP definition:

The registrar shall restrict all changes to the registration data, including 
the data displayed in the publicly available Whois database, and including 
transfer and deletion of the domain names, as well as the name servers on which 
the name is hosted."



Discussion points:

1.      Whois privacy/proxy services—can the registrar “unmask”?
2.     What about transfers/deletions requested immediately prior to the filing 
of the complaint?
3.     Domain name continues to resolve:  some registrars have a take down 
policy where they see TM or ©

URS definition:

The registry shall restrict all changes to the registration data, including 
transfer and deletion of the domain names, but the name will continue to 
resolve"


A couple of follow up questions:

On 1 - is it necessary to "unmask" in whois, or is it sufficient to provide the 
underlying data to the dispute provider? Personally I can see arguments for 
both options.

On 2 - What if the domain is already in the deletion cycle? ie. it has expired 
and is already in the cycle. Or put another way, the deletion is not due to any 
explicit request

On 3 - see where? Sorry - just would appreciate clarification on what you're 
referring to

Regards

Michele





On 29 Aug 2012, at 22:21, "Dorrain, Kristine" 
<kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
wrote:

All:

I volunteered to write up the proposed definition of lock as a starting point.  
My first shot at it is attached.  Feel free to unleash your slings and arrows.  
J  I did include the definition that another group came up with for the URS 
lock and tossed in some things that I was pondering as I drafted.

Talk to you tomorrow (at least it will be tomorrow for me!)

Kristine


Kristine Fordahl Dorrain

Director of Internet and IP Services



National Arbitration Forum (FORUM)
Direct  952. 516. 6456
6465 Wayzata Blvd.
Mobile  952. 836. 8613
Suite 470
Email  kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Minneapolis, MN  55426
http://domains.adrforum.com


This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be privileged 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible 
for delivering it to the intended recipient, please notify the sender 
immediately and destroy all copies of this message and attachments.



From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:23 AM
To: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG

Dear All,

Please find below the proposed agenda for Thursday's meeting.

With best regards,

Marika

Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock WG Meeting – 30 August 2012
• Roll Call / SOI
• Status update public comment forum / SG – C Statements / SO – AC outreach
• Review of proposed work plan (see attached)
• Review of Charter Questions and related comments received as part of the 
Registrar / UDRP Provider Survey (see public comment review tool attached)
• Next steps & confirm next meeting
<Practical definition of a REGISTRAR LOCK for the purposes of UDRP.docx>

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://www.dotwhat.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845




________________________________

--------------------------------------------------------

This e-mail and any attached files are confidential and intended solely for the 
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have 
received this e-mail by mistake, please notify the sender immediately and 
delete it from your system. You must not copy the message or disclose its 
contents to anyone.

Think of the environment: don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

--------------------------------------------------------