Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] RE: Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG

["\"Michele Neylon :: Blacknight\"" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kristine

Thanks for that.

Just to make discussion of this easier I'm copying the text of the document 
into this email:


"Proposed UDRP definition:

The registrar shall restrict all changes to the registration data, including 
the data displayed in the publicly available Whois database, and including 
transfer and deletion of the domain names, but name will continue to resolve.

Discussion points:

1.      Whois privacy/proxy services—can the registrar “unmask”?
2.     What about transfers/deletions requested immediately prior to the filing 
of the complaint?
3.     Domain name continues to resolve:  some registrars have a take down 
policy where they see TM or ©

URS definition:

The registry shall restrict all changes to the registration data, including 
transfer and deletion of the domain names, but the name will continue to 
resolve"


A couple of follow up questions:

On 1 - is it necessary to "unmask" in whois, or is it sufficient to provide the 
underlying data to the dispute provider? Personally I can see arguments for 
both options.

On 2 - What if the domain is already in the deletion cycle? ie. it has expired 
and is already in the cycle. Or put another way, the deletion is not due to any 
explicit request

On 3 - see where? Sorry - just would appreciate clarification on what you're 
referring to

Regards

Michele





On 29 Aug 2012, at 22:21, "Dorrain, Kristine" <kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:

> All:
>  
> I volunteered to write up the proposed definition of lock as a starting 
> point.  My first shot at it is attached.  Feel free to unleash your slings 
> and arrows.  J  I did include the definition that another group came up with 
> for the URS lock and tossed in some things that I was pondering as I drafted.
>  
> Talk to you tomorrow (at least it will be tomorrow for me!)
>  
> Kristine
>  
>  
> Kristine Fordahl Dorrain
>  
> Director of Internet and IP Services
>  
>  
>  
> National Arbitration Forum (FORUM)
> Direct  952. 516. 6456
> 6465 Wayzata Blvd.
> Mobile  952. 836. 8613
> Suite 470
> Email  kdorrain@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Minneapolis, MN  55426
> http://domains.adrforum.com
>  
>  
> This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be 
> privileged information.  If you are not the intended recipient, or the person 
> responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, please notify the 
> sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and attachments.
>  
>  
>  
> From: owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Marika Konings
> Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:23 AM
> To: Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed Agenda - UDRP Domain Name Lock WG
>  
> Dear All,
>  
> Please find below the proposed agenda for Thursday's meeting.
>  
> With best regards,
>  
> Marika
>  
> Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock WG Meeting – 30 August 2012
>       • Roll Call / SOI
>       • Status update public comment forum / SG – C Statements / SO – AC 
> outreach
>       • Review of proposed work plan (see attached)
>       • Review of Charter Questions and related comments received as part of 
> the Registrar / UDRP Provider Survey (see public comment review tool attached)
>       • Next steps & confirm next meeting
> <Practical definition of a REGISTRAR LOCK for the purposes of UDRP.docx>

--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://www.dotwhat.co/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://mneylon.tel/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Fax. +353 (0) 1 4811 763
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845