Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] FW: For your review - sub-team template

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, wrong mailing listŠ.please ignore.

From:  Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Thursday 10 January 2013 15:26
To:  "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  [gnso-lockpdp-wg] FW: For your review - sub-team template

Resending as some of you seem to have difficulty reading the original
message.

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday 10 January 2013 14:50
To: "gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <gnso-thickwhoispdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: For your review - sub-team template

Dear All,

As discussed previously, a possible way to facilitate the work of the
sub-teams would be to provide them with a template that would need to be
completed. This may help guide the discussions while at the same time ensure
that feedback is provided in a similar format which would facilitate the
development of the Initial Report. We've taken a first stab at developing a
possible template and have come up with the following questions:

Sub-Team Template
Issue A

Question 1 ­ Please define / describe Issue A
Question 2 ­ Describe the circumstances of Issue A in a 'thin' Whois
environment
Question 3 ­ Describe the circumstances of Issue A in a 'thick' Whois
environment
Question 4 ­ Identify the advantages of 'thick' Whois for issue A (please
try to quantify or provide data if possible / available)
Question 5 ­ Identify the downsides of 'thick' Whois for issue A (please try
to quantify or provide data if possible / available)
Question 6 ­ Based on your responses to question 4 and 5, please make a
recommendation for whether 'thick' Whois would be recommended only taking
into account Issue A
Question 7 ­ If your response to question 6 is that 'thick' Whois should be
recommended, please provide any additional considerations with regards to
implementation in relation to Issue A that should be taken into account

Please feel free to share any comments and/or edits you may have with the
mailing list. We can review this in further detail at our next meeting.

With best regards,

Marika

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature