<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[gnso-lockpdp-wg] MP3 Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP proceedings teleconference - Thursday 14th February 2013 at 15:00 UTC
- To: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] MP3 Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP proceedings teleconference - Thursday 14th February 2013 at 15:00 UTC
- From: Nathalie Peregrine <nathalie.peregrine@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2013 10:12:21 -0800
Dear All,
The next Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP proceedings teleconference is
scheduled for Thursday, 21 February 2013 at 15:00 UTC.
Please find the MP3 recording of the Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP
proceedings teleconference held on Thursday 14th February 2013 at 15:00 UTC
http://audio.icann.org/gnso/gnso-locking-domain-name-20130214-en.mp3
On page: http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/#feb
The recordings and transcriptions of the calls are posted on the GNSO Master
Calendar page:
http://gnso.icann.org/calendar/
Attendees:
Hago Dafalla - NCUC
Lisa Garono - IPC
Alan Greenberg - ALAC (Vice Chair)
Volker Greimann - RrSG
David Roache-Turner - WIPO
Matt Schneller - IPC
Laurie Anderson - RrSG
Faisal Shah - IPC
Michele Neylon - RrSG (Chair)
Luc Seufer - RrSG
Apologies :
David Maher - RySG
Celia Lerman - CBUC
Gabriela Szlak - CBUC
Marika Konings
ICANN staff:
Berry Cobb
Lars Hoffman
Nathalie Peregrine
** Please let me know if your name has been left off the list **
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Nathalie Peregrine
For GNSO Secretariat
Adobe Connect Chat transcript for 14th February:
Marika Konings:Welcome to the UDRP Domain Name Lock WG Meeting of 14 February
2013
Hago Dafalla:hi all
Michele Neylon:afternoon
Michele Neylon:just dialing in
Michele Neylon:sorry
Laurie Anderson 2:Having some connection problems...dialing in.
Laurie Anderson 2:I appear to be here twice
Volker Greimann:what would you rather fight? One horse-sized duck or 100
duck-sized horses?
Luc Seufer:someone founds the secret of cloning..
Nathalie Peregrine:Alan Greenberg will join shortly
Laurie Anderson 2:Luc, I wish!
Alan Greenberg:Will be on very shortly. Last call running over and I was the
speaker on several issues.
Nathalie Peregrine:Lisa Garono has joined the AC room
Alan Greenberg:on now
Nathalie Peregrine:David Roache Turner has joined the call
Luc Seufer:@Laurie we do the smae but no many decision are implemnted by the
11th day and that's not due to us
Volker Greimann:1. The Parties: The Complainant is *** , represented by
****.The Respondent is *** and **** respectively.
Volker Greimann:is what is usually included in the decision.
Luc Seufer:if providers could add all whois details fields in their complaint
form that would help!
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):these are possibliy practilities (important though
they may be) that could be better addressed at the level of best practices,
than necessaryily making adjustments (which may come at a certain cost in
certainty) to the rules themselves
Volker Greimann:and then it is our obligation to figure out which email
address belongs to the rep of the complaiant
Laurie Anderson 2:The email address of the authorized representative is
listed in the complaint
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):Laurie is right - at WIPO, these are also listed
in the comunications sheet which accompanies notifications (on which parties
and registrars are copied)
Laurie Anderson 2:In our case, we will implement a settlement during a
suspension but the name will remain locked pending a dismissal from the provider
Volker Greimann:same here
Luc Seufer:The National Arbitration Forum hereby authorizes the Registrar to
permit a transfer between the two parties provided the necessary transfer
procedures required by the Registrar for such transfer have been satisfied.
Luc Seufer:here is what NAF provides you with in such cases
Volker Greimann:that is helpful, Luc
Volker Greimann:WIPO does not do that at this time
Laurie Anderson 2:For the record, we never unlock the name or allow the
parties to handle the settlement implementation. We move it, we keep it locked
and only unlock after we receive the dismissal.
Volker Greimann:same here, else there would be potential for abuse
Luc Seufer:but some complainants won't dismiss their complaint until the
domain has been transferred
Luc Seufer:or deleted
Volker Greimann:Indeed. I think that the review of the settlement procedures
could lie with the provider
Luc Seufer:@ Volker +1
Volker Greimann:OTOH, the registrar is best qualified to make sure the
respondent is the other party to the settlement agreement
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):At WIPO the suspension notice would typically
read: We refer to the request received by [[e-mail/fax/letter]] on [[Date]],
from [[source of request]], requesting the suspension of the above-referenced
administrative proceeding. The Center hereby confirms that the administrative
proceeding is suspended until [Suspended until Date]. Upon the expiry of this
date, the proceedings may be deemed automatically terminated, unless the Center
receives a request (copied to the Respondent) in writing from the Complainant
(via e-mail and hardcopy) to re-institute the proceedings. In such event, all
time periods will be calculated from the re-institution date....
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):...Please note that once a UDRP proceeding is
suspended, the concerned registrar may unlock the disputed domain name,
provided the unlock is to enable the implementation of an agreement between the
parties to transfer (or, if agreed, cancel) the domain name from the Respondent
to the Complainant. Therefore, during a suspended proceeding, the domain name
may be transferred to the Complainant, but may not be transferred to a third
party.
Volker Greimann:True David, but I don't recall you instructing the registrar
on the results of the settlement
Laurie Anderson 2:agreed Luc, we do move the name...they can see it in their
account, but they cant do anything with it until we receive the dismissal.
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):+! to Volker's point immediately above
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):...that is to say that the registrar is best
qualified to determine that the respondent is the other party to the settlement
agreement
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):we don't issue instructions on the result of the
settlement, only on the withdrawal (in such event) or continuation and lifting
of suspension (if the matter doesn;t settle)
Luc Seufer:as the only party receiving payment and being without a doubt
equiped with the necessary leagal team, it would make sense to have providers
assume that role and issue instruction
Luc Seufer:(a) The Provider shall review the complaint for administrative
compliance with the Policy and these Rules and, if in compliance, shall forward
the complaint, including any annexes, electronically to the Respondent and
shall send Written Notice of the complaint (together with the explanatory cover
sheet prescribed by the Provider's Supplemental Rules) to the Respondent, in
the manner prescribed by Paragraph 2(a), within three (3) calendar days
following receipt of the fees to be paid by the Complainant in accordance with
Paragraph 19.
Volker Greimann:nothing happens
Luc Seufer:so to put in a nutschell registrars don't need to reply to
provider within 2 business days?
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):within 2 business days would be optimal
Volker Greimann:agreed
Volker Greimann:locking properly is always better
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):its about the lock, absolutely
Laurie Anderson 2:We lock when we receive a verification request. We dont
wait for commencement
David Roache-Turner (WIPO):that is optimal laurie
Luc Seufer:@Laurie registry lock or trade lock as well (transfer to another
account)? Do you allow to suspend DomainByProxy services after this "lock"?
Laurie Anderson 2:@Luc registrar lock upon receipt of a verification request.
We remove DBP at this time so that we may verify the registrant to the
provider. This is covered in the TOS with DBP.
Luc Seufer:ok so everything at once.
Laurie Anderson 2:We do not move to another account until we are implementing
a decision or a settlement agreement
Laurie Anderson 2:yes, also for sake of workflow. We have to be as efficient
as possible
Luc Seufer:if you have too much manpower I can relieve you of some ;-)
Laurie Anderson 2:LOL We can use all we can get!
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|