Re: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] Proposed agenda and materials for review

[Gabriela Szlak <gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear all,

I am very sorry that I won´t be able to be at the call today either.
These weeks have been complicated as I am covering for a colleague who is
on vacations and I need to be at the courts at the time of the calls.
I will review the docs and if I have any edits or questions I will let you
know
My apologies again,
Gabi


-- 

*Gabriela Szlak  *
Regional Director

RED/ODR & eGobernanza (IG)

*eInstituto <http://www.einstituto.org> *
25 de mayo 611 Piso 3º  - C1002ABM
Ciudad Autonoma Buenos Aires - Argentina
(+54 11) 4878-0179
*Twitte:* @gabiszlak

*Skype:* gabrielaszlak
odr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

egobernanza@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx




2013/2/19 Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>

> Dear All,
>
> Please find below the proposed agenda for the next UDRP Domain Name Lock
> WG meeting (Thursday 21 February at 15.00 UTC). You are strongly encouraged
> to review the latest version of the straw man proposal (attached) and share
> any remaining comments / edits with the mailing list ahead of the meeting
> as the aim is to 'finalise' the straw man proposal following Thursday's
> call for inclusion in the Initial Report. You are also encouraged to start
> reviewing the latest draft of the Initial Report (see attached).
>
> Thanks
>
> Marika
>
> *Proposed Agenda – UDRP Domain Name Lock Working Group Meeting 21
> February 2013*
>
>    1. Roll Call / SOI Updates
>    2. Review of latest version of straw man proposal (see attached)
>    3. Definition of 'lock' - in the straw man proposal we define 'lock'
>    in this context as preventing any changes of registrar and registrant. Does
>    more work need to be done on this definition, or should we just create an
>    additional recommendation that provides this definition?
>    4. Deadlines for review of straw man proposal and Initial Report Review
>    5. Next steps / confirm next meeting
>
>