ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review - additional recommendation for inclusion in the report

  • To: "Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <Gnso-lockpdp-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-lockpdp-wg] For your review - additional recommendation for inclusion in the report
  • From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 02:23:47 -0700

Dear All,

In response to the survey results (see
8iaJW3iY_3d) and the discussions during the last meeting, the WG has
proposed to add the following recommendation to its report:

Participating UDRP Respondents be granted an express option to request a
four day extension should they so choose, with any such received four day
extension request to be automatically granted, and the corresponding
deadline extended by the UDRP Provider, at no cost to the Respondent. The
availability of such automatic four day extension option on request should
also be flagged by the UDRP Provider for the Respondent's information on
commencement of the proceedings.

The rationale for adding this recommendation is to address the concerns
expressed during the public comment forum concerning the loss of informal
response time as a result of the proposed change to no longer require the
Complainant to notify the Respondent at the time of filing and would give
those participating Respondents that actually need the extra four days the
comfort of cost-neutral certainty where requested, without impacting the
UDRP timelines overall. The WG also agreed that the other options considered
to address this concern would also be reflected in the report to serve as
background information.

If anyone objects to this approach, please share your comments / concerns
with the mailing list ahead of the next meeting.

With best regards,


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy