ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-metrep-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index    

Re: [gnso-metrep-wg] A possible case study

  • To: Pam Little <pam.little12@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-metrep-wg] A possible case study
  • From: Theo Geurts <theo.geurts@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 10:53:15 +0200 (CEST)

During my ramble i forgot to mention that this case is indeed a very possible 
study and could proof to be very valuable to the ICANN community since it is a 
hot topic.

Regards, 

Theo Geurts

----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "Pam Little" <pam.little12@xxxxxxxxx>
Aan: gnso-metrep-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: gnso-secs@xxxxxxxxx
Verzonden: Donderdag 3 april 2014 07:05:49
Onderwerp: [gnso-metrep-wg] A possible case study 




Dear WG Colleagues 



I thought this blog might be of interest: 



“Are Whois email checks doing more harm than good?” 
http://domainincite.com/16375-are-whois-email-checks-doing-more-harm-than-good#comments
 



To me, it raises a number of questions relevant to this WG. For example: 



· Was there data used to support those WHOIS related changes reflected in the 
2013 RAA? 

· If so, what was the data and the baseline? 

· How will effectiveness of changes be measured? 

· Who will be collecting the data to measure effectiveness? ICANN? Registrars? 
Law enforcement agencies (through the GAC) that advocated for those changes? 



At Singapore meeting, I heard comments about “regulatory impact assessment” . I 
do not recall such an assessment done before those changes were introduced. 
Anyone? 



Kind regards, 



Pam




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index    

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy