ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[gnso-osc-csg] RE: Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC

  • To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC
  • From: "Julie Hedlund" <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:05:31 -0400

Dear Work Team Members,

The agenda for the 22 May meeting also is posted on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.

Thank you.

Julie
  -----Original Message-----
  From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
Olga Cavalli
  Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 5:01 PM
  To: OSC-CSG Work Team
  Cc: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Hoggarth; Olga Cavalli; Michael Young
  Subject: Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC



  Dear WT members,
  this is the proposed agenda for the conference call on next Friday 22 May.
  Your comments are welcome.
  Best regards
  Olga


  Proposed Agenda:

  1. Review the status of pending issues:

  1.1. Letter to OSC. Due date: Friday, 15 May.

  1.2. Project Plans: Each subtask leader should develop a preliminary
project plan suggesting the timing for completing the subtask. Due date: Two
weeks – by the next meeting on Friday, 22 May.

  So far we have recieved the plans from RyC and IPC

  1.3. Identification of Best & Bad Practices. Due date: Four weeks – by the
meeting on Friday, 05 June.

  2. Comments to the letter drafted by Julie "Draft Toolkit Feedback Request
for Documents".

  3. Comments on how to enhance constituency participation in our working
team.

  Should we have a conference call on Friday May 29th?


  4. Comments in relation wit base documents for our work prepared by staff:


  - Constituency analysis
  - Proposed Stakeholder group charter analysis


  So far we have recieved comments from RyC and IPC, so there is a new
version that incorporates these inputs.
  Are there any other comments about these tables?
  Could we consider these documents completed as a reference for the
continuation of our work?

  5. Next steps: analysis of the existing information and expected outome
format

  SS has made an excellent analysis of the documents produced by staff.
  Should a similar detailed analisys be produced for all the base documents
when the working team has agreed on their content?
  How should we organize this work?


  6. The formal status of  the COT as a constituent part of the OSC.
(Suggested by Victoria)
  7. The role of the OSC in relation with our work product. (Suggested by
Victoria)

  8. Any other business



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy