Re: [gnso-osc-csg] RE: Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie!
regards
Olga

2009/5/20 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Work Team Members,
>
> The agenda for the 22 May meeting also is posted on the wiki at:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Julie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> *From:* olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]*On Behalf Of
> *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 20, 2009 5:01 PM
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Cc:* jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Hoggarth; Olga Cavalli; Michael Young
> *Subject:* Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC
>
>
> Dear WT members,
> this is the proposed agenda for the conference call on next Friday 22 May.
> Your comments are welcome.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
> *Proposed Agenda:*
>
> 1. Review the status of pending issues:
>
> 1.1. Letter to OSC. Due date: Friday, 15 May.
>
> 1.2. Project Plans: Each subtask leader should develop a preliminary
> project plan suggesting the timing for completing the subtask. Due date: Two
> weeks – by the next meeting on Friday, 22 May.
>
> So far we have recieved the plans from RyC and IPC
>
> 1.3. Identification of Best & Bad Practices. Due date: Four weeks – by the
> meeting on Friday, 05 June.
> 2. Comments to the letter drafted by Julie "Draft Toolkit Feedback Request
> for Documents".
>
> 3. Comments on how to enhance constituency participation in our working
> team.
> Should we have a conference call on Friday May 29th?
>
> 4. Comments in relation wit base documents for our work prepared by staff:
>
> - Constituency analysis
> - Proposed Stakeholder group charter analysis
>
> So far we have recieved comments from RyC and IPC, so there is a new
> version that incorporates these inputs.
> Are there any other comments about these tables?
> Could we consider these documents completed as a reference for the
> continuation of our work?
>
> 5. Next steps: analysis of the existing information and expected outome
> format
> SS has made an excellent analysis of the documents produced by staff.
> Should a similar detailed analisys be produced for all the base documents
> when the working team has agreed on their content?
> How should we organize this work?
>
> 6. The formal status of  the COT as a constituent part of the OSC.
> (Suggested by Victoria)
> 7. The role of the OSC in relation with our work product. (Suggested by
> Victoria)
>
> 8. Any other business
>
>