RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC

["Claudio Di Gangi" <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>]

Dear Olga,
 
I just wanted to clarify that regarding the input and responses the team 
receives from Hector, Victoria, and I:
 
We are each participating on this GNSO Improvements team as IPC members, but 
not as official Constistuency Representatives - the IPC has not choosen any 
official representatives to serve on this team. For example, you may notice 
that my statement of interest reflects: "ARRANGEMENTS CONCERNING MEMBERSHIP: 
NONE"
 
If this is not clear from the others SOI, they should be clarified and updated.
 
Personally, I would be happy to liaise back to the Constistuency to obtain any 
official IPC input when necessary on the team's work. I understand that you may 
have been just using shorthand below in the agenda, but I just wanted to make 
sure that we were all on the same page regarding this issue.
 
As I have been away of late (in part, attending the recent IRT meeting in San 
Francisco), I have not had the opportunity to provide further input on the 
team's work. Upon my return next week, I will have further comments on the 
constistuency analysis document Victoria circulated recently.
 
Thank you for your continued leadership work.
 
Claudio

________________________________

From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Wed 5/20/2009 5:01 PM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Hoggarth; Olga Cavalli; Michael Young
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 
13:00 UTC



Dear WT members,
this is the proposed agenda for the conference call on next Friday 22 May.
Your comments are welcome.
Best regards
Olga


Proposed Agenda:

1. Review the status of pending issues:


1.1. Letter to OSC. Due date: Friday, 15 May.

1.2. Project Plans: Each subtask leader should develop a preliminary project 
plan suggesting the timing for completing the subtask. Due date: Two weeks - by 
the next meeting on Friday, 22 May.

So far we have recieved the plans from RyC and IPC

1.3. Identification of Best & Bad Practices. Due date: Four weeks - by the 
meeting on Friday, 05 June.

2. Comments to the letter drafted by Julie "Draft Toolkit Feedback Request for 
Documents".

3. Comments on how to enhance constituency participation in our working team. 

Should we have a conference call on Friday May 29th?


4. Comments in relation wit base documents for our work prepared by staff:


- Constituency analysis
- Proposed Stakeholder group charter analysis


So far we have recieved comments from RyC and IPC, so there is a new version 
that incorporates these inputs.
Are there any other comments about these tables? 
Could we consider these documents completed as a reference for the continuation 
of our work?
 
5. Next steps: analysis of the existing information and expected outome format

SS has made an excellent analysis of the documents produced by staff.
Should a similar detailed analisys be produced for all the base documents when 
the working team has agreed on their content?
How should we organize this work?


6. The formal status of  the COT as a constituent part of the OSC. (Suggested 
by Victoria)
7. The role of the OSC in relation with our work product. (Suggested by 
Victoria)

8. Any other business