Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22 May 13:00 UTC

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Claudio,
thank you for your email.
I think that any comment from your constituency that may help our work is
welcome, as for example official IPC input on different documents we
produce.
As I have mentioned before, the active involvement of constituencies in or
working team´s work is relevant for producing good outcomes.
Regards
Olga



2009/5/20 Claudio Di Gangi <CDiGangi@xxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Olga,
>
> I just wanted to clarify that regarding the input and responses the team
> receives from Hector, Victoria, and I:
>
> We are each participating on this GNSO Improvements team as IPC members,
> but not as official Constistuency Representatives - the IPC has not choosen
> any official representatives to serve on this team. For example, you may
> notice that my statement of interest reflects: "ARRANGEMENTS CONCERNING
> MEMBERSHIP: NONE"
>
> If this is not clear from the others SOI, they should be clarified and
> updated.
>
> Personally, I would be happy to liaise back to the Constistuency to obtain
> any official IPC input when necessary on the team's work. I understand that
> you may have been just using shorthand below in the agenda, but I just
> wanted to make sure that we were all on the same page regarding this issue.
>
> As I have been away of late (in part, attending the recent IRT meeting in
> San Francisco), I have not had the opportunity to provide further input on
> the team's work. Upon my return next week, I will have further comments on
> the constistuency analysis document Victoria circulated recently.
>
> Thank you for your continued leadership work.
>
> Claudio
>
>  ------------------------------
>  *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx on behalf of Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Wed 5/20/2009 5:01 PM
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Cc:* jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx; Rob Hoggarth; Olga Cavalli; Michael Young
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Agenda - CSG Work Team conference call Friday 22
> May 13:00 UTC
>
>
> Dear WT members,
> this is the proposed agenda for the conference call on next Friday 22 May.
> Your comments are welcome.
> Best regards
> Olga
>
>
> *Proposed Agenda:*
>
> 1. Review the status of pending issues:
>
> 1.1. Letter to OSC. Due date: Friday, 15 May.
>
> 1.2. Project Plans: Each subtask leader should develop a preliminary
> project plan suggesting the timing for completing the subtask. Due date: Two
> weeks – by the next meeting on Friday, 22 May.
>
> So far we have recieved the plans from RyC and IPC
>
> 1.3. Identification of Best & Bad Practices. Due date: Four weeks – by the
> meeting on Friday, 05 June.
> 2. Comments to the letter drafted by Julie "Draft Toolkit Feedback Request
> for Documents".
>
> 3. Comments on how to enhance constituency participation in our working
> team.
> Should we have a conference call on Friday May 29th?
>
> 4. Comments in relation wit base documents for our work prepared by staff:
>
> - Constituency analysis
> - Proposed Stakeholder group charter analysis
>
> So far we have recieved comments from RyC and IPC, so there is a new
> version that incorporates these inputs.
> Are there any other comments about these tables?
> Could we consider these documents completed as a reference for the
> continuation of our work?
>
> 5. Next steps: analysis of the existing information and expected outome
> format
> SS has made an excellent analysis of the documents produced by staff.
> Should a similar detailed analisys be produced for all the base documents
> when the working team has agreed on their content?
> How should we organize this work?
>
> 6. The formal status of  the COT as a constituent part of the OSC.
> (Suggested by Victoria)
> 7. The role of the OSC in relation with our work product. (Suggested by
> Victoria)
>
> 8. Any other business
>
>