[gnso-osc-csg] RE: Additional Constituency Staff Analysis Information

["Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Robert. 

 

I draw the team's attention to the new template Constituency Charter
-already prepared by staff. 

 

See "In its next amendment process, Staff suggests that the IPC consider
using the New Constituency Petition and Charter Template (hereinafter
"Template") as a guide for both organization and content.  It was
developed by the Staff to be consistent with the improvements
recommendations endorsed by the ICANN Board and is available at:  
http://gnso.icann.org/en/improvements/newco-process-en.htm.''  

 

Olga/Chuck/ -were you aware of this document? 

 

Regards, 

 

Victoria McEvedy

Principal 

McEvedys

Solicitors and Attorneys 

 

 

96 Westbourne Park Road 

London 

W2 5PL

 

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122

F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721

M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169 

 

www.mcevedy.eu  

Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972

This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may
also be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please
let us know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its
attachments without reading, copying or forwarding the contents.

This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no
retainer is created by this email communication. 

 

From: Robert Hoggarth [mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 22 May 2009 20:21
To: Victoria McEvedy; Hector Ariel Manoff; Claudio Di Gangi
Cc: Ken Bour; Julie Hedlund
Subject: Additional Constituency Staff Analysis Information

 

Dear Victoria, Hector and Claudio;

My memo to the CSG Work Team earlier today reminded a colleague that one
of the preliminary informal discussions between staff and community
included the IPC (It wasn't a bad experience so I don't know why I
blanked on it) and that an analysis of the IPC Charter was shared with
the IPC leadership. 

In the interest of getting you all the information you can handle, I
have tracked down and am attaching a copy of that feedback to this
message. I think it is largely similar in substance to the document that
Julie prepared for the team, but in the interest of information sharing
(hopefully not overload) I am including that information for you. 

I will try to track down the other materials related to those
preliminary discussions with other constituencies as appropriate and
share them collectively with the entire CSG team next week.  As I said
in today's memo, I think Julie's analysis largely covered the field, but
it won't hurt to do further comparisons, or at least have that
information available for your analysis.

Have a great weekend!

Rob Hoggarth