ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and 5 june 2009 13 GMT Meeting Agenda

  • To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and 5 june 2009 13 GMT Meeting Agenda
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:14:43 -0400

Olga,
 
I think it would be a lot easier to do a Doodle for finding a meeting
time in Sydney than trying to do it in our meeting.  Or at least it
would help a lot if we did a Doodle before the meeting.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 2:41 PM
        To: OSC-CSG Work Team
        Cc: Julie Hedlund; Olga Cavalli
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and 5 june 2009 13 GMT
Meeting Agenda
        
        
        Dear Working team members,
        
        I hope this email finds you well. Next Friday 5 June, 13 GMT we
will have our next conference call.
        
        In relation to what was discussed during our last conference
call I would like to point the following:
        
        Project Plans:
        We still need some deffinitions for Substask 3.  
        As fas as I know Tony and Krista are working with staff in order
to schedule meetings in Sydney to obtaining the needed information.
        In this sense could you please send the working plan including
estimated dates so we can update our wiki?
        Thanks!!
        
        Best and bad pracices / Additional criteria:
        In reviewing both documents "Analysis of
constituency/stakeholder", I found some fist layer analysis in the
"keys" included in the document (appears to meet criteria, does not meet
criteria, unclear) and I coloured the charts in relation with these
keys.
        
        One idea coudl be to fill each of this boxes of the chart with
those constituency charter concepts or elements that are good to be
considered for our recommendations. Victoria and SS have started in
finding these concepts and this could be our starting point for the
analysis. I will explain more in detail this idea during the call on
Friday, and of course I welcome others.
        
        For the moment, find attached the two charts with the
corresponding different colours for each key.
        
        This is the proposed agenda for the next conference call, feel
free to add any other issue that may be of relevance or suggest changes.
        
        1- Possible date / time of a face to face meeting in Sydney,
review of remote access time zones and planning of the meeing.
        2- Project plans revision: goals achieved, next steps.
        3- Best and bad practices: already recieved information,next
steps.
        4- Additional criteria for reviewing the existing information:
exchange of ideas.
        5- Any other business.
        
        Best regards to all.
        Olga
        
        
        
        2009/5/22 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                Dear Work Team Members,
                 
                Thank you for today's meeting.  Here are the action
items we discussed.  These also are posted on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
In addition, the meeting notes are posted at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operation_work
_team_meeting_notes.  Your suggestions for changes/additions are
welcome. 
                 
                22 May Action Items
                 
                1.  Project Plans: Each subtask leader should develop a
preliminary project plan suggesting the timing for completing the
subtask. New due date: Tuesday, 26 May
                 
                2.   Identification of Best & Bad Practices: Subtask
leaders and their team members should identify best practices as well as
bad practices, as they relate to their subtasks, using as a starting
point the preliminary analysis of constituency/stakeholder charters, but
also information on constituency web pages, and directly from
constituencies. Due date: Four weeks - by the meeting on Friday, 05 June
                 
                3.  Draft Toolkit Feedback Request Document: Julie will
make the changes Olga has suggested and send a revision to Olga and the
team.  Due date: Tuesday, 26 May
                 
                4.  Additional Criteria for Constituency Charter
Analysis: Work Team members will provide suggestions for additional
criteria to the email list.
                 
                Thank you.
                 
                Best regards,
                 
                Julie
                 
                
                Julie Hedlund
                Policy Consultant
                




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy