Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and 5 june 2009 13 GMT Meeting Agenda

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck for the comment,
my idea was to review certain desirable times and dates to give some ideas
to Gisella, and mainly exchange some ideas about the purpose of the meeting.
I agree with you that it does not make sense to try to find a date / time
during the call.
Perhaps Gisella could send the Doodle during the week , as she was planning
to do it soon.
Regards
Olga
2009/6/1 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>  Olga,
>
> I think it would be a lot easier to do a Doodle for finding a meeting time
> in Sydney than trying to do it in our meeting.  Or at least it would help a
> lot if we did a Doodle before the meeting.
>
> Chuck
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Monday, June 01, 2009 2:41 PM
> *To:* OSC-CSG WorkI  Team
> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; Olga Cavalli
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps and 5 june 2009 13 GMT Meeting Agenda
>
>   Dear Working team members,
>
> I hope this email finds you well. Next *Friday 5 June, 13 GMT *we will
> have our next conference call.
>
> In relation to what was discussed during our last conference call I would
> like to point the following:
>
> *Project Plans:*
> We still need some deffinitions for Substask 3.
> As fas as I know Tony and Krista are working with staff in order to
> schedule meetings in Sydney to obtaining the needed information.
> In this sense could you please send the working plan including estimated
> dates so we can update our wiki?
> Thanks!!
>
> *Best and bad pracices / Additional criteria:*
> In reviewing both documents "Analysis of constituency/stakeholder", I
> found some fist layer analysis in the "keys" included in the document
> (appears to meet criteria, does not meet criteria, unclear) and I coloured
> the charts in relation with these keys.
>
> One idea coudl be to fill each of this boxes of the chart with those
> constituency charter concepts or elements that are good to be considered for
> our recommendations. Victoria and SS have started in finding these concepts
> and this could be our starting point for the analysis. I will explain more
> in detail this idea during the call on Friday, and of course I welcome
> others.
>
> For the moment, find attached the two charts with the corresponding
> different colours for each key.
>
> This is the *proposed agenda for the next conference call, *feel free to
> add any other issue that may be of relevance or suggest changes.
>
> 1- Possible date / time of a face to face meeting in Sydney, review of
> remote access time zones and planning of the meeing.
> 2- Project plans revision: goals achieved, next steps.
> 3- Best and bad practices: already recieved information,next steps.
> 4- Additional criteria for reviewing the existing information: exchange of
> ideas.
> 5- Any other business.
>
> Best regards to all.
> Olga
>
>
> 2009/5/22 Julie Hedlund <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>>  Dear Work Team Members,
>>
>> Thank you for today's meeting.  Here are the action items we discussed.
>> These also are posted on the wiki at:
>> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team.
>> In addition, the meeting notes are posted at:
>> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operation_work_team_meeting_notes.
>> Your suggestions for changes/additions are welcome.
>>
>> *22 May Action Items*
>> **
>> *1.  Project Plans:* Each subtask leader should develop a preliminary
>> project plan suggesting the timing for completing the subtask. *New due
>> date: Tuesday, 26 May*
>>
>> *2.  ** Identification of Best & Bad Practices:* Subtask leaders and
>> their team members should identify best practices as well as bad practices,
>> as they relate to their subtasks, using as a starting point the preliminary
>> analysis of constituency/stakeholder charters, but also information on
>> constituency web pages, and directly from constituencies. *Due date: Four
>> weeks – by the meeting on Friday, 05 June*
>>
>> *3.  **Draft Toolkit Feedback Request Document*: Julie will make the
>> changes Olga has suggested and send a revision to Olga and the team.  *Due
>> date: Tuesday, 26 May*
>>
>> *4.  Additional Criteria for Constituency Charter Analysis:* Work Team
>> members will provide suggestions for additional criteria to the email list.
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Julie
>>
>> Julie Hedlund
>> Policy Consultant
>>
>
>