RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Olga.  Nice job.  Please see my responses below.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
        Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:29 AM
        To: OSC-CSG Work Team
        Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert 
Hoggarth
        Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps
        
        
        Dear Work Team members,
        
        First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.
        
        We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in 
order to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the end 
of next week.
        
        In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference 
call today:
        
        1. WT should look and comment SS document.
        SS will add background and additional information and will circulate 
new version of the document. 
        [Gomes, Chuck] Has the subtask team finished its work?  If so, then it 
makes sense to me for the full WT to review SS's document.  If not, shouldn't 
we wait until then to avoid redundent work.
        
        2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for 
next Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of 
the wt also can comment.
        
        3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations 
document, Victoria will join them in doing this task.
        WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.
        
        4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to 
your draft document about subtask 4?
        
        5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my 
suggestion is to use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: 
references, introduction, background, recommendations and add a general 
conclusion. I volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the 
different parts ready.
        
        6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document 
to the OSC. 
        Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that 
the document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next 
conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24. 
        [Gomes, Chuck] If the OSC receives recommendations NLT 10 September, 
that would give a few days for the OSC to consider them and hopefully allow 
submission NLT 17 September to the Council.  Earlier of course would be better. 
        
        Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.
        
        Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and 
hard work.
        
        Best
        Olga
        
        
        -- 
        Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
        www.south-ssig.com.ar