ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps-SS

  • To: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps-SS
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 14:41:00 -0300

Thanks SS, keep the WT updated about the different parts of your work and I
also suggest that we set up due dates for recieveing comments of each of
them.
Best regards and have a nice weekend.
Olga

2009/8/28 SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>

> Dear Olga,
> I appreciate your approach for two action items for subtask 1.2.
> I will  give references for the document circulated just before Aug 28 and
> re-circulate it to WT.
> As for as background material, let me complete Recommendations on
> all clauses (or subsections) of subtask 1 and coplile them into a single
> document. That document will have all the relevent information.
> --
> I have chosen to do the work in pieces. If WT can look into these small
> documents, its well and good or else, they can give their inputs to a Whole
> document at a later date.
> regards,
> SS
>
> --- On *Fri, 8/28/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps
> To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <
> jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gisella Gruber-White" <
> Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>,
> "Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:59 PM
>
> Thanks Chuck for your comments, specially those about dates.
> Lets have Friday 4 September as a first due date for finishing draft
> recommendations and in the folowing days perhaps we can work on drafting the
> final version of the document.
> Thanks all for the hard work and active participation.
> Have a nice weekend. Regards
> Olga
>
> 2009/8/28 Gomes, Chuck 
> <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
>>  Thanks Olga.  Nice job.  Please see my responses below.
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> *From:* 
>> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>[mailto:
>> owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>]
>> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
>> *Sent:* Friday, August 28, 2009 10:29 AM
>> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
>> *Cc:* Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert
>> Hoggarth
>> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps
>>
>>  Dear Work Team members,
>>
>> First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.
>>
>> We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in
>> order to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the
>> end of next week.
>>
>> In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference call
>> today:
>>
>> 1. WT should look and comment SS document.
>> SS will add background and additional information and will circulate new
>> version of the document.
>> [Gomes, Chuck] Has the subtask team finished its work?  If so, then it
>> makes sense to me for the full WT to review SS's document.  If not,
>> shouldn't we wait until then to avoid redundent work.
>>
>> 2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for next
>> Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of
>> the wt also can comment.
>>
>> 3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations
>> document, Victoria will join them in doing this task.
>> WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.
>>
>> 4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to
>> your draft document about subtask 4?
>>
>> 5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my suggestion
>> is to use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: references,
>> introduction, background, recommendations and add a general conclusion. I
>> volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the different parts
>> ready.
>>
>> 6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document to
>> the OSC.
>> Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that the
>> document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next
>> conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24.
>> [Gomes, Chuck] If the OSC receives recommendations NLT 10 September, that
>> would give a few days for the OSC to consider them and hopefully allow
>> submission NLT 17 September to the Council.  Earlier of course would be
>> better.
>>
>> Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.
>>
>> Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and
>> hard work.
>>
>> Best
>> Olga
>>
>>
>> --
>> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
>> www.south-ssig.com.ar
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
> www.south-ssig.com.ar
>
>
>


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy