Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps-SS

[SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Olga,
I appreciate your approach for two action items for subtask 1.2.
I will  give references for the document circulated just before Aug 28 and 
re-circulate it to WT.
As for as background material, let me complete Recommendations on all clauses 
(or subsections) of subtask 1 and coplile them into a single document. That 
document will have all the relevent information.
--
I have chosen to do the work in pieces. If WT can look into these small 
documents, its well and good or else, they can give their inputs to a Whole 
document at a later date.
regards,  
SS

--- On Fri, 8/28/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" 
<jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Gisella Gruber-White" 
<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, 
"Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:59 PM


Thanks Chuck for your comments, specially those about dates.
Lets have Friday 4 September as a first due date for finishing draft 
recommendations and in the folowing days perhaps we can work on drafting the 
final version of the document.
Thanks all for the hard work and active participation.
Have a nice weekend. Regards
Olga


2009/8/28 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Thanks Olga.  Nice job.  Please see my responses below.
 
Chuck




From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 10:29 AM
To: OSC-CSG Work Team
Cc: Julie Hedlund; Gisella Gruber-White; Glen de Saint Géry; Robert Hoggarth
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps



Dear Work Team members,

First let me commend all of you for all the work done so far.

We have made a great progress and we still have some more work to do in order 
to reach our gol in finishing a recommendations draft document by the end of 
next week.

In this sense let me summarize what was discussed in our conference call today:

1. WT should look and comment SS document.
SS will add background and additional information and will circulate new 
version of the document. 
[Gomes, Chuck] Has the subtask team finished its work?  If so, then it makes 
sense to me for the full WT to review SS's document.  If not, shouldn't we wait 
until then to avoid redundent work. 


2. A due date for sending comments to Victoria´s document is set for next 
Tuesday, members of subworking team are welcome to comment and the rest of the 
wt also can comment.

3. Krista and Tony will send to the list their draft recommendations document, 
Victoria will join them in doing this task.
WT should review and comment the document once sent to the list.

4. Julie: is it possible to consider / include Claudio´s suggestions to your 
draft document about subtask 4?

5. Formatting of the final draft recommendations document: my suggestion is to 
use the same format that Julie and Chuck use in theirs: references, 
introduction, background, recommendations and add a general conclusion. I 
volunteer for preparing the general draft once we have the different parts 
ready.

6. Timing: we should define the due date for sending our draft document to the 
OSC. 
Chuck, could you please help us defining this date? Considering that the 
document must be approved by the OSC and by the GNSO council and next 
conference call of GNSO are Sept 3 and Sept 24. 
[Gomes, Chuck] If the OSC receives recommendations NLT 10 September, that would 
give a few days for the OSC to consider them and hopefully allow submission NLT 
17 September to the Council.  Earlier of course would be better.  


Remember that we have our next conference call next Friday 1300 GMT.

Have a nice weekend and thanks again for your active participation and hard 
work.

Best
Olga


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar



-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar