Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Victoria,
you are right, we did not had that call because there was not enough time.
Lets talk about this tomorrow and we will find the way to reach consensus.
Regards
Olga

2009/9/10 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>

>  As I advised on the call last week – we had the option of holding a call
> before I circulated a new draft incorporating comments or after. We took the
> after option due to the shortness of time. I have already said we need to
> allow time to reach consensus.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
>
> Principal
>
> McEvedys
>
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys *
>
> [image: cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC]
>
>
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
>
> London
>
> W2 5PL
>
>
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
>
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
>
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
>
> * *
>
> *www.mcevedy.eu  ***
>
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
>
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
>
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
>
> *From:* Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* 10 September 2009 21:01
> *To:* Victoria McEvedy; OSC-CSG Work Team
>
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS
>
>
>
> Thanks Victoria.
>
>
>
> What is the level of support from the full subtask team for the
> recommendations?  Many of them would drastically change already approved SG
> charters and I suspect constituency charters as well.  Do the constituency
> reps on the subtask team support such recommendations?
>
>
>
> I get the impression that I reviewed this way before there was consensus by
> the subtask team.  If that is the case, I apologize.
>
>
>
> My comments and edits are highlighted in the attached file for the subtask
> team's consideration.
>
>
>
> Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Victoria McEvedy
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 10, 2009 11:14 AM
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli; Julie Hedlund
> *Subject:* RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS
>
> Please find attached the final report for Subtask 1.2.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Victoria McEvedy
>
> Principal
>
> McEvedys
>
> *Solicitors** and Attorneys *
>
> [image: cid:669FC637-760A-4D2F-B56E-2C180C1870CC]
>
>
>
> 96 Westbourne Park Road
>
> London
>
> W2 5PL
>
>
>
> T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
>
> F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
>
> M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169
>
> * *
>
> *www.mcevedy.eu  ***
>
> Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
>
> This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the
> exclusive use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also
> be legally privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us
> know by reply immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without
> reading, copying or forwarding the contents.
>
> This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer
> is created by this email communication.
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *SS Kshatriy
> *Sent:* 09 September 2009 23:38
> *To:* OSC-CSG Work Team
> *Cc:* Olga Cavalli
> *Subject:* [gnso-osc-csg] Draft 2- Subtask 1- SS
>
>
>
> Hi Everybody,
>
> I have attached Draft 2 Subtask 1. this is improvement on Draft 1 earlier
> circulated and and suitably incorporates inputs from Chuck and Victoria..
>
>
>
> best regards,
>
>
>
> SS
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4411 (20090909) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4412 (20090909) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4414 (20090910) __________
>
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
>
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4414 (20090910) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4415 (20090910) __________
>
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature database 4415 (20090910) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>



-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar