Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Next Steps

[SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Olga,
I will be sending minority report against sending subtask 1.4 (Toolkit) as a 
separate document. I will be able to send only after I have completed Subtask 1 
work. In case there is some deadline or urgency, please let me know as it will 
take some time. I will all the details in that report.
regards,

Regards,
SS
--

--- On Tue, 9/29/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Next Steps
> To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" 
> <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 7:42 AM
> Dear Working Team,
> 
> I was away for three days and I am really impressed by the
> level of activity in our mailing list.
> 
> After reviewing all the comments, I want to summarize what
> we agreed in our last conference call and propose some next
> steps to follow. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> In relation with the Subworking team´s draft documents:
> 
> 1.1: SS will send a new draft version by early this week
> that includes all comments recieved by the subworking team.
> The draft document will be reviewed by the whole working
> team. A reasonable due date for reviewing this draft
> document must be established.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1.2: Victoria will send a new draft version by early this
> week that includes all
> comments recieved by the subworking team. The draft
> document will be
> reviewed by the whole working team. A reasonable due date
> for reviewing this draft document must be established.
> 
> 1.3: Krista and Tony have already submitted their draft
> document, that contains already all comments from the
> subworking team. This document is ready to be reviewed by
> the whole working team.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 1.4: Julie submitted on 9 September a new draft version of
> 1.4 subtask document that included comments made by Claudio
> and myself. Some workteam members have not had the chance to
> review this document and will do soon, they can also submit
> comments.
> 
> 
> 
> Once the 1.4 draft document is reveiwed and agreed by the
> working team, there has been a suggestion of sending it to
> the OSC as a separate document, before the rest of the
> documents have been reviewed by the whole working team.
> 
> 
> The working team did not reach unanimous consensus.
> 
> 
> In this sense, and in the light of all the comments
> exchanged in the call and in the email list, I would like to
> remind what the Working Group Process indicates on this
> regard:
> The WG shall function on the basis of rough
> consensus, meaning all
> points of view will be discussed until the chair can
> ascertain that the
> point of view is understood and has been covered. Consensus
> views
> should include the names and affiliations of those in
> agreement with
> that view. Anyone with a minority view will be invited to
> include a
> discussion in the WG report. Minority report should include
> the names
> and affiliations of those contributing to the minority
> report.(for the whole text of the Working Group
> Process please refer to: 
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process)
> 
> 
> 
> After reviewing all the comments in the mailing list, there
> seems to be rough consensus in sending 1.4 toolkit document,
> as an independent document, to the OSC and to the GNSO
> Council.
> 
> In this sense I encourage those not in favour of sending
> this 1.4 toolkit document, to send their names and
> affiliations and their views in order to be included in a
> minority report.
> 
> 
> 
> Also all those in agreement of sending the 1.4 tool kit
> document as a separate one, please send name an affiliations
> to be included in the report.
> 
> I really appreciate the high involvement of all the working
> team, and at the same time I want to stress the value of
> constructive work and the need for respecting theoppinions
> and work of other collegues members of the working team and
> staff.
> 
> 
> Althoug we all have the right to express ourselves and
> support our positions, flexibility is many times the best
> way for a constructive work and for a timely and good
> outcome.
> 
> 
> I also want to thank again the excellent work done by ICANN
> Staff involved in this working team.
> 
> Looking forward to recieveing your comments.
> 
> I send you my best regards.
> 
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
> www.south-ssig.com.ar
> 
>