Re: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Next Steps

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear SS,
thanks for letting us know.
Regards
Olga

2009/9/30 SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>

>
> Dear Olga,
> I will be sending minority report against sending subtask 1.4 (Toolkit) as
> a separate document. I will be able to send only after I have completed
> Subtask 1 work. In case there is some deadline or urgency, please let me
> know as it will take some time. I will all the details in that report.
> regards,
>
> Regards,
> SS
> --
>
> --- On Tue, 9/29/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] OSC CSG Working Team - Next Steps
> > To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Julie Hedlund" <
> jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Hoggarth" <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tuesday, September 29, 2009, 7:42 AM
> > Dear Working Team,
> >
> > I was away for three days and I am really impressed by the
> > level of activity in our mailing list.
> >
> > After reviewing all the comments, I want to summarize what
> > we agreed in our last conference call and propose some next
> > steps to follow.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > In relation with the Subworking team´s draft documents:
> >
> > 1.1: SS will send a new draft version by early this week
> > that includes all comments recieved by the subworking team.
> > The draft document will be reviewed by the whole working
> > team. A reasonable due date for reviewing this draft
> > document must be established.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.2: Victoria will send a new draft version by early this
> > week that includes all
> > comments recieved by the subworking team. The draft
> > document will be
> > reviewed by the whole working team. A reasonable due date
> > for reviewing this draft document must be established.
> >
> > 1.3: Krista and Tony have already submitted their draft
> > document, that contains already all comments from the
> > subworking team. This document is ready to be reviewed by
> > the whole working team.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.4: Julie submitted on 9 September a new draft version of
> > 1.4 subtask document that included comments made by Claudio
> > and myself. Some workteam members have not had the chance to
> > review this document and will do soon, they can also submit
> > comments.
> >
> >
> >
> > Once the 1.4 draft document is reveiwed and agreed by the
> > working team, there has been a suggestion of sending it to
> > the OSC as a separate document, before the rest of the
> > documents have been reviewed by the whole working team.
> >
> >
> > The working team did not reach unanimous consensus.
> >
> >
> > In this sense, and in the light of all the comments
> > exchanged in the call and in the email list, I would like to
> > remind what the Working Group Process indicates on this
> > regard:
> > The WG shall function on the basis of rough
> > consensus, meaning all
> > points of view will be discussed until the chair can
> > ascertain that the
> > point of view is understood and has been covered. Consensus
> > views
> > should include the names and affiliations of those in
> > agreement with
> > that view. Anyone with a minority view will be invited to
> > include a
> > discussion in the WG report. Minority report should include
> > the names
> > and affiliations of those contributing to the minority
> > report.(for the whole text of the Working Group
> > Process please refer to:
> https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process)
> >
> >
> >
> > After reviewing all the comments in the mailing list, there
> > seems to be rough consensus in sending 1.4 toolkit document,
> > as an independent document, to the OSC and to the GNSO
> > Council.
> >
> > In this sense I encourage those not in favour of sending
> > this 1.4 toolkit document, to send their names and
> > affiliations and their views in order to be included in a
> > minority report.
> >
> >
> >
> > Also all those in agreement of sending the 1.4 tool kit
> > document as a separate one, please send name an affiliations
> > to be included in the report.
> >
> > I really appreciate the high involvement of all the working
> > team, and at the same time I want to stress the value of
> > constructive work and the need for respecting theoppinions
> > and work of other collegues members of the working team and
> > staff.
> >
> >
> > Althoug we all have the right to express ourselves and
> > support our positions, flexibility is many times the best
> > way for a constructive work and for a timely and good
> > outcome.
> >
> >
> > I also want to thank again the excellent work done by ICANN
> > Staff involved in this working team.
> >
> > Looking forward to recieveing your comments.
> >
> > I send you my best regards.
> >
> > Olga
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
> > www.south-ssig.com.ar
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar