Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit Recommen-ss

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

That would defeat the purpose of a minority report.  A minority report is not a 
vote. 

 
The reason for a minority report is that it allows the item (report) to move 
ahead but attached with additional minority report(s) for reference by others 
(in this case the OSC).  SS would surely recognize this as many others as 
similar in the context of judgments to dissenting judgments. (India and 
Pakistan share a common law judicial heritage). The existence of a dissenting 
judgment does not exclude the delivery of the judgment.  Similarly a minority 
report doesn't come in the way of moving forward here.




                                       
Sincerely,

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com


*** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink 
***

-----Original Message-----
From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 22:10:21 
To: gnso-osc-csg<gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>; Julie 
Hedlund<julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>; Olga Cavalli<olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommen-ss

Hi Julie and Olga,
I know that I am late to reply to this mail.
But there is valid reason.
This may also be construed as re-opening the old issue. But this issue is not 
the case, as this issue is not yet settled.
---
I was busy with Minority Report and that is when I looked in detail into the 
report.
There are some explainations or details necessary; then only it can be updated.
Also, Tool Kit has become a controversial issue due to minority reports--as 
many as four members not agreeing to it.
In my opinion, it is best to defer any discussion or decision on this until 
out-come on minority reports is known.
best regards,
ss


S. S. KSHATRIYA

--- On Fri, 9/25/09, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] ACTION ITEM: Task 1, Subtask 4: Draft Tool Kit 
Recommendations
To: "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, September 25, 2009, 8:36 AM


Dear Work Team members,

On today’s call we discussed the final draft of the Tool Kit Services 
Recommendations for GNSO Organizations (Draft 3 11 Sept 09), which incorporates 
changes suggested by Claudio.  On the call we decided to circulate this final 
draft to allow time for those who have not already done so to comment on the 
document.  The Work Team is asking for a response from you, no later than 
Tuesday, 29 September, on the following:



Any suggested changes to Draft 3 of the Tool Kit Services Recommendations 
If no suggested changes, please affirm that you agree with the final draft 
version of the Recommendations 
Please indicate whether these Recommendations should be provided  a) to the OSC 
as soon as they are agreed to by the Work Team; b) along with Recommendations 
for the other Subtasks; or c) please let us know if you have suggestions for 
another way to handle these Recommendations.

Also, those of you who were at the meeting please feel free to add comments or 
clarifications to my summary of this action item from our meeting. Please let 
me know if you have any questions.

Thank you very much.

Best regards,

Julie