ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps Constituency Operations Working Group

  • To: OSC-CSG Work Team <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps Constituency Operations Working Group
  • From: SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 03:07:21 -0700 (PDT)

Hi Olga,
In reply to your email with above subject line, I will like to copy my email 
sent to you separately a few hrs earlier.
------





Hi Olga,
this is further to my input in the meeting reg charter guidelines. As the time 
was over for the meeting, I could not complete my input.
However, I am giving below extract from Charter tthat relates to forwarding of 
minority report.
 
 <<   In all cases, the Chair will include the names and affiliations of those 
in support of each position and for participants representing a group (e.g., 
constituencies, stakeholder groups, other groups) will indicate if their 
support represents the consensus view of their constituency/group.>>
--
Let me stress here Olga that my this excercise is purily to assist you..     
regards,
ss                                                                                                                                            m               
 
-------------------------------------------
 
I am not sure if members have to ascertain from their Constituencies whether 
their stand is in keeping with consensus view of their constituencis/groups?
SS
 
--- On Fri, 10/16/09, Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Next steps Constituency Operations Working Group
To: "OSC-CSG Work Team" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Julie Hedlund" <jahedlund@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Robert Hoggarth" 
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>, "Glen de Saint Géry" <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gisella 
Gruber-White" <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 16, 2009, 7:09 AM


Hi,
thanks for the active participation in today´s call.
These are our next steps:

1- Subworking teams 1.1 and 1.2 should send draft documents for full working 
team revision by next Wednesday 21 october.

2- Krista as leader of subworking team 1.3 will send draft version of the 
document for full working team revision during next days.

3- Due date for submitting minority reports is extended one day more until 
saturday 12 pm UTC.

4- Me as chair of the wt will revise the rough consensus and will inform the 
working team through the list, in the next days. 

5- Julie will draft the report about 1.4 draft document including minority 
reports, names and affiliations.

Please feel free to add other issues if needed.

Have a nice weekend and for those travelling to Seoul have safe and nice 
flights.

Best regards
Olga






2009/10/15 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Working Team,


I hope this email finds you well.

This is the proposed agenda for the conference call tomorrow, please let me 
know if you have any comments or suggested changes:

1- Subtask 1.1 and 1.2 Draft Documents:
SS and Victoria have both sent their draft documents.
We should establish a due date for revision of the whole working team.

2- Subtask 1.3 Draft Document.
After hearing no comments or suggested changes this draft version is ready for 
bein included in the final draft.

3- Minority reports: two minorities reports have been sent to the list so far. 
Due date for sending them is tomorrow Friday 16 October.
We must agree next steps to prepare the final document with Subtask 1.4 Draft 
document and Minority reports.

4- Revision of due dates for delivering our outcomes.

5- AOB


As promised in one of my previous emails and after consultations with ICANN 
staff and with the OSC, let me share with you information about these pending 
issues.

Reopening an issue:

As per the text included as follows that has been referred to in our emai list:

“..the Chair should be able to ensure that anyone joining a WG after it has 
begun has reviewed all documents and mailing list postings and agrees not to 
reopen  previously decided questions.”

Please note that this paragraph belongs to Section 1.3 of the “Implementation 
and Charter Drafting Guidelines – FINAL 24 September 2009.”  The Policy Process 
Steering Committee (PPSC) Working Group Work Team drafted this document.

This language is not in the Charter of the OSC Constituency and Stakeholder 
Group Operations Work Team, which was approved on 13 April 2009.  

Complete text of our charter can found in our working team wiki:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_work_team_charter

The guide for our Work Team is our Charter.


About the deletion of recorded participation:

This situation is not frequent and there have been occasional requests over the 
years to modify or delete GNSO archives or email lists. 

Generally, these requests are not accommodated as they go against ICANN’s 
spirit and tradition of transparency.

If there is a specific request to expunging a record, the next step in the 
process would be for the requester to officially petition this to the Working 
Team Secretariat and the final decision will be done in consultation with the 
General Counsel´s Office.

Looking forward to talking to you tomorrow.
Best regards
Olga









-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar



      


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy