ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[gnso-osc-csg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO-OSC-CSG: Subtask 1.2 Team

  • To: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "S.S. Kshatriy" <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO-OSC-CSG: Subtask 1.2 Team
  • From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 15:51:53 -0800

Dear Olga,

Yes, you are recalling correctly.  I reviewed the Charter as to whether there 
was a restriction on new members to the Work Team.  I did not review the 
Charter with respect to the number of Councilors, which I believe - as you have 
noted - is a different issue, but one which was explored and settled on today's 
call.

Best regards,

Julie


On 11/6/09 6:02 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

SS,
thanks for your email.
I think that there are two issues here which are different:

1. new members to the working team
2. the limit of 4 GNSO councilors participating in the working team

For what I can recall in Julie´s message, she was referring to "language 
restricting the admission of new members to the Work Team" in our charter, 
which is not there.

She was not specifically mentioning the limit of 4, which in my modest oppinion 
is a different issue.

Anyway, I will let Julie or Robert answer to you.

Regards
Olga

2009/11/6 SS Kshatriy <sskshatriy@xxxxxxxxx>
Hello Julie and Olga,
Since the issue of Debie joining WT has already been discussed in  the call and 
now settled, my mail may look out of way.
But since it comes from a Staff member, and WT depends on staff for 
authoritative information, I thought it right to write and have for this 
reason, copied this mail to Rob too.
--
Julie says that she has gone through the charter. How had she failed to notice 
guidelines relating to the number of Council Members in WT?

SS
--
--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO-OSC-CSG: Subtask 1.2 Team
To: "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "gnso-osc-csg" <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>, "HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Victoria McEvedy" <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, November 5, 2009, 11:52 AM


Dear Olga,

If it is helpful, I have reviewed the Constituency Operations and Stakeholder 
Group Charter and there does not appear to be any language restricting the 
admission of new members to the Work Team:  
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?osc_constituency_operations_work_team_charter.
  There is the distinction of "active" and "inactive" members, but  the Charter 
states that "An Inactive member may resume Active status at any time by 
participating in a GCOT meeting or by participating in the determination of a 
consensus position."

Unfortunately, I will need to miss tomorrow's call, but Rob will be attending.

I hope that this information is helpful.

Best regards,

Julie


On 11/5/09 2:42 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Victoria,
let me remind you that the GNSO Council has a brand new structure with many new 
members.
Their experience and knowledge will bring new ideas to the working teams, of 
course if they are willing to review the work done so far.
Also let me remind you that we still have Task 2 to work on, which is about 
global outreach.
Debbie works for the Red Cross in the USA and I am sure that her experience 
will be relevant to this new stage in our work.
I welcome comments from other members of the working team.
Regards
Olga

2009/11/5 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>
I'm sorry but I think it is too late for new members -the entire work of the 
group is nearly complete and the only reason this can be being done is to 
adjust the voting and consensus numbers. It's utterly objectionable and makes a 
farce of the whole process.



Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3340378313_238141]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx 
<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> ] On 
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 05 November 2009 19:28
To: Victoria McEvedy
Cc: gnso-osc-csg; HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Subject: Re: GNSO-OSC-CSG: Subtask 1.2 Team

Victoria,
Debbie Hughes is a new council member that will participate in our working team.
As she has not yet been included in the email list because of some 
administrative delays, she is copied as a separate email in the general working 
team communication through emails.
Debbie participated in our face to face meeting in Seoul and has expressed 
interest in being part of our working team.
She has committed to review all previos documents and information relevant to 
our work.
She is not part of Substask 1.2 subworking team.
Best regards
Olga

2009/11/5 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>

Olga -I note that you have ccd a new person to your email -the subtask group is 
about to complete its work and is on the final draft. It is too late for a new 
member of the subtask team. I trust this was an oversight. Please advise.

Thank you.



Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3340378313_266600]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.


From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx 
<http://us.mc572.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx> ] On 
Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: 05 November 2009 19:05
To: Victoria McEvedy
Cc: gnso-osc-csg; Michael Young; Rafik Dammak; Anthony Harris; Claudio Di 
Gangi; Julie Hedlund; HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: GNSO-OSC-CSG: Subtask 1.2 Team


Thanks Victoria for your comments.
We will take them in consideration during the call tomorrow, I do hope that you 
can join us.
Best regards
Olga

2009/11/5 Victoria McEvedy <victoria@xxxxxxxxxx>

Dear Subtask members, I've only now had a chance to listen to the MP3 of the 
last meeting.

Michael -I must correct the record. Your comments on Annex B were reflected in 
the last draft as a minority position in Part III at point 10. Tony's agreement 
with them was recorded there also. No other subtask team member had indicated 
agreement with your changes on this list. If you wish them to be added in full 
to Part V or elsewhere, they can be. They can also be discussed again by the 
subtask group. If you wish we can arrange a separate call.

I had circulated this document before the Seoul meeting and asked for changes 
to language and no comments were received to that request -so the version you 
had at the meeting reflected the lack of response and silence was taken as 
consent.

I do not have a transcript of the call -and do not wish to try to work from the 
MP3. So I must ask Subteam members to now reline into the document the exact 
changes they would like to the language. I will then try to prepare a final 
amendment and re-circulate.

I'm afraid I have a long standing lunch appointment tomorrow and will not be 
able to attend the call.

Thank you and best regards,

Victoria McEvedy
Principal
McEvedys
Solicitors and Attorneys
[cid:3340378313_243931]

96 Westbourne Park Road
London
W2 5PL

T:    +44 (0) 207 243 6122
F:    +44 (0) 207 022 1721
M:   +44 (0) 7990 625 169

www.mcevedy.eu
Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority #465972
This email and its attachments are confidential and intended for the exclusive 
use of the addressee(s).  This email and its attachments may also be legally 
privileged. If you have received this in error, please let us know by reply 
immediately and destroy the email and its attachments without reading, copying 
or forwarding the contents.
This email does not create a solicitor-client relationship and no retainer is 
created by this email communication.



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature 
database 4576 (20091105) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com <http://www.eset.com/>



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com


JPEG image

JPEG image

JPEG image



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy