[gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO CSG WT conference call next Friday 29 January

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Working Team members,

Per Olga’s message, I have included below the comments received from Chuck and 
Michael.  Also, please see the Subtask 1.1 draft document with changes 
indicated in ALL CAPS or strikeout, as applicable, in the wiki at 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1.
  I have included in the wiki Chuck’s question and Michael’s suggested changes 
in curly brackets {} for reference for our discussion on Friday.  In addition, 
for reference in case we begin discussion on Friday on the Subtask 2 document, 
here is the link to the wiki: 
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
 Please let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie

>From Chuck, 15 January

Section 2.f says, ". . . The GROUP shall SELECT such a neutral third party in 
consultation with ICANN/GNSO."  What is meant by ICANN/GNSO?  Do we mean ICANN 
policy Staff?  Do we mean the GNSO Council?  etc.  The names 'ICANN' and "GNSO' 
have very broad and sometimes varied definitions.  We should be more specific 
here.  The other changes made look okay to me.

>From Michael, 18 January

The “gist” of any objection is interpretive and since I do not see any 
guaranteed method of ensuring that “gist” is properly defined by anyone other 
than the objector. I suggest we make the following change:

From

“In particular, the applicant shall be advised of the gist of any objection to 
the application and be given the opportunity to REPLY WITH CLARIFICATION.”

To

“In particular, the applicant shall be advised of any objection to the 
application, BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE 
OBJECTION, and be given the opportunity to REPLY TO THE OBJECTION WITH 
CLARIFICATION.”


On 1/27/10 1:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear Working Team members,

I hope this email finds you well.

Unfortunately due to an unexpected trip to the region, I will not be able to 
chair the call next Friday. Michael has been so kind to confirm that he will 
participate and chair the call.

I suggest that the call last one hour and after that we keep on working through 
the email list, until our next meeting.

In our last call we almost finished the revision of Subtask 1.1 draft document, 
which should be done and then we must start with Subtask 1.2 document revision. 
There are also comments from Chuck and Michael that should be reviewed and 
included.

Documents are uploaded into our wiki, and Julie is the one in charge of making 
the corresponding changes to the text.

Julie please send the links to the list for general reference.

Regards and thanks
Olga




2010/1/15 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi,
thanks for the active participation today, we made very good progress.

We amost finished the revision of Subtask 1.1 draft document.

Proposed next steps are:

a- Section 1, paragraph b:
Victoria, Krista and Olga will elaborate a text based on our
discussion and will propose it to the group.

b- Section 2, paragraph d1:
Victoria and Claudio will elaborate a text based on our discussion and
will propose it to the group.

c- All changes made to the text will be incorporated to the wiki,
Julie will circulate the link to the working team.

e- For those not present in the call, please review the new version of
the tex and made comments as soon as possible.

f- The following text still needs to be reviewd by the whole working
team, I suggest that we exchange comments and suggested edits to this
part, which is the only text left to finish Subtask 1.1 draft document
revision:

...............................................................................................................................................................
j. No legal or natural person shall be entitled to join more than one
Constituency or Stakeholder GROUP as a voting member.

Section 3. Policy and Consensus

All members of GROUPs shall be eligible to participate in the Policy
work of the GROUP and to join Committees formed to deal with policy
issues and other GROUP issues, including eligibility of membership in
the GROUP’s committees.

GROUPs shall function on the GNSO WG model for the purpose of reaching
consensus and the use of voting should be minimized as much as
possible. 7
..............................................................................................................................................................

g- Next week there will be no support for conference calls, so next
meeting will take place on Friday 29 January.

I will welcome comments about making this call of one hour or two hours long.
I am ok with both options.

Have a nice weekend, and thanks again for your participation.

Regards
Olga