Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Re: GNSO CSG WT conference call next Friday 29 January

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Julie.
Regards
Olga

2010/1/27 Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>

>  Dear Working Team members,
>
> Per Olga’s message, I have included below the comments received from Chuck
> and Michael.  Also, please see the Subtask 1.1 draft document with changes
> indicated in ALL CAPS or strikeout, as applicable, in the wiki at
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1.
>  I have included in the wiki Chuck’s question and Michael’s suggested
> changes in curly brackets {} for reference for our discussion on Friday.  In
> addition, for reference in case we begin discussion on Friday on the Subtask
> 2 document, here is the link to the wiki:
> https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
> Please let me know if you have any questions.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> *From Chuck, 15 January
> *
> Section 2.f says, ". . . The GROUP shall SELECT such a neutral third party
> in consultation with ICANN/GNSO."  What is meant by ICANN/GNSO?  Do we mean
> ICANN policy Staff?  Do we mean the GNSO Council?  etc.  The names 'ICANN'
> and "GNSO' have very broad and sometimes varied definitions.  We should be
> more specific here.  The other changes made look okay to me.
>
> *From Michael, 18 January
> *
> The “gist” of any objection is interpretive and since I do not see any
> guaranteed method of ensuring that “gist” is properly defined by anyone
> other than the objector. I suggest we make the following change:
>
> From
>
> “In particular, the applicant shall be advised of the gist of any objection
> to the application and be given the opportunity to REPLY WITH
> CLARIFICATION.”
>
> To
>
> “In particular, the applicant shall be advised of any objection to the
> application, BE GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY TO ASK CLARIFYING QUESTIONS ABOUT THE
> OBJECTION, and be given the opportunity to REPLY TO THE OBJECTION WITH
> CLARIFICATION.”
>
>
>
> On 1/27/10 1:30 PM, "Olga Cavalli" <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Working Team members,
>
> I hope this email finds you well.
>
> Unfortunately due to an unexpected trip to the region, I will not be able
> to chair the call next Friday. Michael has been so kind to confirm that he
> will participate and chair the call.
>
> I suggest that the call last one hour and after that we keep on working
> through the email list, until our next meeting.
>
> In our last call we almost finished the revision of Subtask 1.1 draft
> document, which should be done and then we must start with Subtask 1.2
> document revision. There are also comments from Chuck and Michael that
> should be reviewed and included.
>
> Documents are uploaded into our wiki, and Julie is the one in charge of
> making the corresponding changes to the text.
>
> Julie please send the links to the list for general reference.
>
> Regards and thanks
> Olga
>
>
>
>
> 2010/1/15 Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
> thanks for the active participation today, we made very good progress.
>
> We amost finished the revision of Subtask 1.1 draft document.
>
> Proposed next steps are:
>
> a- Section 1, paragraph b:
> Victoria, Krista and Olga will elaborate a text based on our
> discussion and will propose it to the group.
>
> b- Section 2, paragraph d1:
> Victoria and Claudio will elaborate a text based on our discussion and
> will propose it to the group.
>
> c- All changes made to the text will be incorporated to the wiki,
> Julie will circulate the link to the working team.
>
> e- For those not present in the call, please review the new version of
> the tex and made comments as soon as possible.
>
> f- The following text still needs to be reviewd by the whole working
> team, I suggest that we exchange comments and suggested edits to this
> part, which is the only text left to finish Subtask 1.1 draft document
> revision:
>
>
> ...............................................................................................................................................................
> j. No legal or natural person shall be entitled to join more than one
> Constituency or Stakeholder GROUP as a voting member.
>
> Section 3. Policy and Consensus
>
> All members of GROUPs shall be eligible to participate in the Policy
> work of the GROUP and to join Committees formed to deal with policy
> issues and other GROUP issues, including eligibility of membership in
> the GROUP’s committees.
>
> GROUPs shall function on the GNSO WG model for the purpose of reaching
> consensus and the use of voting should be minimized as much as
> possible. 7
>
> ..............................................................................................................................................................
>
> g- Next week there will be no support for conference calls, so next
> meeting will take place on Friday 29 January.
>
> I will welcome comments about making this call of one hour or two hours
> long.
> I am ok with both options.
>
> Have a nice weekend, and thanks again for your participation.
>
> Regards
> Olga
>
>
>
>