<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 29 January Meeting
- To: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, Chuck Gomes <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, gnso-osc-csg <gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 29 January Meeting
- From: Claudio Di Gangi <cdigangi@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:00:06 -0500
Sorry, I saw two typos and fixed them in the below text.
Claudio
________________________________________
From: Claudio Di Gangi
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 9:42 PM
To: Julie Hedlund; Chuck Gomes; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: RE: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 29 January Meeting
Dear Work team,
I proposed the following edit to better flush out and clarify this
recommendation.
please see below in CAPS for additions
THERE SHOULD BE EMPHASIS ON CONSENSUS BUILDING IN GROUP DELIBERATIONS. GROUPs
SHOULD REFER to the GNSO WG model. The use of voting WITHIN POLICY
DELIBERATIONS should be minimized as much as possible.
WHATEVER CONSENSUS BUILDING MODEL OR PROCESS A GROUP USES, THE GROUP MUST
DESCRIBE THE PROCESS IN THEIR BYLAWS OR CHARTER SO IT IS VISIBLE AND
TRANSPARENT.
________________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Julie Hedlund [julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 6:04 PM
To: Chuck Gomes; gnso-osc-csg
Subject: Re: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 29 January Meeting
Thanks Chuck, I was hoping that Krista and others would respond to this email
to indicate whether the new time works for them, but I can send a specific
message to Krista too.
Yes, Task 1, Subtask 1 is pending a response from ICANN legal staff, although
we did make it through the discussion of the document.
We have not yet taken up Subtask 2.
Thanks again,
Julie
On 1/29/10 5:37 PM, "Chuck Gomes" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Julie. Was Krista okay with the time change?
Regarding 2 below, I don't think we have quite finished discussion of task 1,
subtask 2 because of item 1 below. It is correct though that we did finish
going through subtask 2.
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-osc-csg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 5:29 PM
To: gnso-osc-csg
Subject: [gnso-osc-csg] Actions/Summary: 29 January Meeting
Dear Work Team members,
Here are the actions/summary from today’s meeting. Please note that our next
meeting will be held next Friday, 05 February, beginning 1 hour earlier — at
1300 UTC/0500 PST/0800 EST — and is scheduled for 90 minutes. Please let me
know if you are unable to meet at that time. The topic of our discussion next
week will be the Task 1, Subtask 2 document at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_and_stake_holder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_2.
In addition, for the next 4 weeks we will meet weekly.
Note that the actions and summary also are included on our wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_operations_team and
changes to the Task 1, Subtask 1 document are included on the wiki at:
https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1
and are shown in ALL CAPS and strikeout, as appropriate.
Thank you very much and I hope you have a nice weekend.
Best regards,
Julie
Actions/Summary:
1. Julie Hedlund will circulate language from Task 1, Subtask 1, Section 2f to
ICANN legal staff for review and suggested approaches.
2. Work Team members completed the discussion of Task 1, Subtask 1. Julie
Hedlund incorporated changes in the wiki document (reflected in ALL CAPS and
strikeout) at: Task 1, Subtask 1
<https://st.icann.org/icann-osc/index.cgi?constituency_stakeholder_group_operations_work_team_task_1_subtask_1>
3. The Work Team agreed to meet weekly for the next four weeks beginning at
1300 UTC for 90 minutes. The next meeting will begin with a discussion of Task
1, Subtask 2.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|